Is AMD Hyperthreading the same as INTEL Hyperthreading?

Hyper-threading was originally created by AMD. Even somebody else applied for a patent. Although the architecture of these two U's is different, hyperthreading is the same. AMD's single-core performance was too poor before, so the U with four modules, eight cores and eight threads in FX was only based on the manufacturing process of 32 nanometers, which was really not enough for Intel's 22 14, even if it was a heap core. Now that the single core has caught up, it is not necessary. AMD didn't do it before, not because people didn't have the technology, but because it always wanted to make up for the single core by stacking materials. After all, the single core is only Celeron level, and even made a wonderful heater like FX959. Strictly speaking, FX is a quad-core and eight-wire with double charging, because every two cores * * * share one * * with one floating-point arithmetic unit and other units, and become a module, which is really a practical oddity. AMD is the big cow of imagination in off the charts, the technical house of wafer industry, and all kinds of imaginative ideas. Just because of the processing level, I can't realize my dream, but I don't regret it for many years. Fortunately, Ruilong appeared, and the standard of the foundry was also improved, otherwise the toothpaste factory could retract the toothpaste.