Marie Curie gave up her patent on radium and became a two-time Nobel Prize winner. What do you think about this? About 300 words.

1. It shows that certain scientific research results may gain greater benefits if they do not choose patent protection.

2. The reason for generating greater benefits is that the patent system itself may have limitations.

3. This limitation may be reflected in the overemphasis on economic benefits and insufficient dissemination and promotion of knowledge. If Marie Curie had applied for a patent that year, a series of matters such as the review by the Patent Office might have affected the promotion and utilization of the results, which would have delayed or even changed the historical process in the field of nuclear physics, and would have had different historical impacts. The judging criteria of the Dynamite Awards judges.