Which is better, LeTV or Xiaomi TV? Comparison between Xiaomi TV 3 and LeTV Super 3 X55
First of all, we compare the product technology of both parties. Although Xiaomi TV 3 and LeTV Super 3 X55 both adopt all-metal technology, there are great differences in product details between them. Xiaomi TV 3 fuselage adopts metal docking technology, and Super 3 X55 fuselage adopts metal seamless bending integrated molding technology.
If the two are compared, the seamless metal bending integrated molding technology adopted by 3 X55 is slightly better. Seamless bending technology makes the TV frame more beautiful and safer, and prevents the TV from being cleaned or accidentally collided. However, the spliced metal frame used by Xiaomi TV 3 generally has sharp corners, which is very easy to hurt users, and it is also very dangerous if there are children at home.
In addition, LeTV has also done a very good job in humanized details. There are dust plugs in many parts of the fuselage to prevent dust from entering the TV. I believe that when it comes to who is better, consumers have their own destiny.
Rejecting the plastic LeTV metal remote control feels good.
Often the comparison of TV products is also the competition of two product accessories. Xiaomi TV remote control and Letv Super Remote Control 3 are also very different. Comparing the materials of the two products, the plastic-based Xiaomi remote control and the metal-based LeTV super remote control 3 light have obvious differences in feel. (165438+ 10, letv super tv comes standard with super remote controller 3).
As a user who pursues touch control, Bian Xiao will find that the metal LeTV Super Remote Control 3 will give people an excellent touch, just like touching it on a smooth mirror. When touching Xiaomi Remote Control, it will feel less smooth and awkward.
In addition, the most difficult product technology at present is metal technology, especially integrated products, which need to overcome many problems, and the cost of metal technology has to pay more costs. Most importantly, the somatosensory remote control of Xiaomi TV 3 is not standard, and users need to buy it separately. On the contrary, LeTV Super Remote Control 3 is a product with collective sensing function, which does not require users to generate secondary consumption. To tell the truth, the product mix is a bit different, and consumers understand it.
Reject the mediocre new function of LeTV EUI system and play the leading role.
Many people are familiar with MIUI system. With the excellent influence of Xiaomi mobile phone, MIUI has become an intelligent system deeply loved by 654.38 billion users. However, careful users will find that it has not changed much since its launch. Xiaomi TV 3 only adds voice function in the current version. Other than that, nothing special. On the contrary, the EUI system owned by LeTV super tv consists of five desktops: intelligent application, video recommendation, carousel desktop, search desktop and video source. Based on the exclusive online live desktop created by LeTV's powerful film and television library, the search desktop for free video search on the whole network, and the convenient and fast interactive live broadcast of the signal source desktop, all the wonderful things are locked for you. In addition, LeTV EUI also supports rich multi-screen interaction, voice input/control, cloud services and other functions, which can be fully enjoyed by all departments of LeTV super tv.
If we compare the distinctive functions in Xiaomi TV 3 and Letv Super 3 X55 systems, it seems that we can only find new voice functions in Xiaomi TV, and there are no bright spots in other aspects. In contrast, the EUI system of LeTV 3 X55 has many special functions, such as remote voice 2.0 function, gesture/skeletal somatosensory technology, top USB3.0 interface, live desktop, 4K own content resources and so on, which are unmatched by Xiaomi.
Letv hardware configuration highlights humanization. Xiaomi is far behind.
Judging from the hardware competition between Xiaomi TV 3 and LeTV Super 3 X55, the difference between them is not obvious. Both sides use MStar 6A9 18 processor, 4-core CPU+4-core GPU and 2GB+8GB memory, but the screen sizes are different. However, both sides used the LG D 4K 2D screen with a refresh rate of 60Hz to ensure that the dynamic picture was not distorted or tailed, except that Xiaomi TV 3 had 6M60. In terms of color gamut, there are obvious differences between the two. Xiaomi TV 3 has 85% color gamut, and LeTV Super 3 X55 has 72% color gamut, which is actually difficult for consumers to choose. Users who like bright colors will choose high-color TV. But at present, some users report that TV screens with high color saturation are often not realistic enough, and there are glare and visual fatigue. I believe that users will judge whether it is good or bad.