On the contrary, it is the minority, not the majority, who do not want to be promoted to leadership in the system. Those who claim that they don't want to be leaders may just "talk" and fool honest people. Let me refute several "false" reasons:
First, being a leader has heavy responsibilities and great pressure. Is that really the case? Wrong.
if something goes wrong, who will be dealt with more severely? Leaders have responsibilities, most of them have leadership responsibilities and management responsibilities, and they are subject to more disciplinary actions. In a few years, they can be transferred to other places. What about the employees below? Are directly responsible. Handling must be heavier than leadership, and serious dismissal. Ordinary people have been punished, and their careers have basically reached the peak. Unlike leaders, they can continue to communicate and use after two or three years of silence.
second, being a leader is more tiring. Is that really the case? Wrong.
no matter how tired a leader is, he will not be more tired than his employees. Leaders use their brains and direct people, and low-level leaders also do their own work. However, ordinary employees have to do specific things and finish them according to time nodes. Quality and progress are also controlled by leaders, and modification, rework and rectification are also increased by leaders. When leaders are tired, they are tired of heart and brain, while employees are tired of brain, physical strength and heart. Being scolded by the leader may take a few more days.
thirdly, there is no advantage in being a leader's income. Is that really the case? Wrong.
In the workplace within the system, the income structure is still pyramidal. The higher the rank, the higher the income. The gap between public services and institutions may not be too big on the surface. For example, the annual salary of unit leaders is 2,, and that of ordinary people is 12,. In central enterprises and state-owned enterprises, the annual salary gap between leaders and employees may be as high as 1 times or more. After becoming a leader, he still enjoys a lot of benefits, which are also "economic benefits" that outsiders don't know. For example, leaders of a certain rank can enjoy full medical reimbursement, take the green channel, live in special wards, and so on.
fourthly, it's no good being a leader. Is that really the case? Wrong.
It is very difficult for the children of ordinary families to get into the unit with good salary and welfare and to be promoted quickly. The "marginal effect" and "invisible benefit" of leadership are incalculable. For example, they can put their children in good units and earn high salaries all their lives.
Of course, in the workplace, there are also a few people who don't want to be promoted to leadership, mainly for the following reasons:
First, personality reasons.
individuals are really unfit to be leaders. For example, some people don't like to be in charge of others and don't want to lead the team, so it's not that they don't want to be leaders, but that everyone thinks they are unfit to be leaders. Therefore, the unit won't let them be leaders, so they borrow the donkey from the slope to show their unwillingness to be leaders. If you give him a leadership position, try it and see if he is willing?
second, family reasons.
In the system, there are indeed a group of people, whose families are not short of money, even the second generation. People join the work not to be leaders, let alone to earn wages, but to find something to do, so don't go astray and do nothing. This kind of person is here to muddle along, and people really don't want to be leaders to worry about it.
Third, people with firm career plans.
Some people like to engage in majors, skills and business. As they get older, they become more popular and earn a lot of money. Why should they be leaders? For example, in scientific research institutions, educational institutions and business departments, it is easy to lose one's major after being a leader, so it is better to concentrate on technology. Senior teachers in the school have a lot of room to make money. Surgeons in hospitals definitely make more money than leaders. The technical backbone of scientific research institutions, people use patents to integrate Industry-University-Research, and their income is immeasurable.
fourth, people who have no room for promotion.
these people can see clearly that it is not that he doesn't want to be a leader, but that the unit has eliminated them. For example, some people have not been promoted to the grass-roots deputy after 4 years old and the middle-level deputy after 49 years old, and the unit has promoted youthfulness. They can't see the hope. Instead of working hard, they might as well change to a virtual position, with a lot of treatment, not going to work and going home to have grandchildren. This is also an attitude towards life.
Fifth, people with higher sideline income.
These people have certain talents and business acumen. For example, some people do live broadcast, engage in e-commerce, invest, open corporate restaurants, and so on. People's sideline income far outperforms wages. Work is a kind of bottom; Salary is to get social security and pension in the future. People are unwilling to be leaders because they have a second career.
To sum up, as an ordinary person in the system, don't be fooled by this topic. Children of ordinary families should work hard and strive for an early promotion and salary increase. Man struggles upwards and water flows downwards. You don't know the benefits of being a leader without being a leader. When your position is getting higher and higher and your horizons are getting wider and wider, you will understand that hard work and early promotion and salary increase are the most reliable way to life.