Stiga's international brand is correct, and it is famous for being the most suitable for China people.
However, it is certainly irresponsible for such an advanced board to talk nonsense without personal evaluation (contempt for some answers). Below, I will tell you a few boards that I personally evaluated, hoping to help you:
1. Stigaoc (official classic):
Advantages:
(1) Eating the ball and feeling of throughput is obvious: this board.
(2) Strength and foot strength: The "loop machine" is not a hollow reputation. The ball is deeply eaten into the bottom plate and then thrown out of the generate. The energy is simply staggering. It is hard to imagine that such a slim plate body actually contains such powerful and unparalleled strength, and the more solid the force is, the easier it is to control the arc. OC's bottom strength is recognized as sufficient. When the ball leaves the platform, it sends out a strong force. When the ball flies in the air, the ball speed decreases less, and the second speed is amazing after landing. There is little (almost no) "ceiling" effect that the strength of the general floor can't be improved after the force reaches a certain level.
Shortcomings:
(1) Attacking and bouncing are not refreshing enough: large deformation is a double-edged sword, which is beneficial to pulling the ball, but it is precisely because of too large deformation that the ball is eaten too deeply during attacking and bouncing, and the deformation recovery time is long, which causes the ball to be slow, empty, fleshy and shocking. Perhaps many people can adapt to or even like OC's unique shocking feel, but this feeling of sloppily deviates completely from attacking and bouncing the ball.
(2) The ball control and defense are weak: OC is like a spring, which greatly affects OC's ball and defense. When the force is too small, it is easy to get off the net, and when the force is too strong, it suddenly pops up, which makes it very abrupt. It is difficult to put it short and control the landing point. Because of the poor leverage, most defenses also require the initiative to meet the front. Apart from mistakes, physical exertion is also a problem.
2. StigaTO (tube official):
Advantages:
In a word, "comprehensive performance, outstanding specialty", which is actually very difficult TO achieve, but to is undoubtedly the baseboard closest to this point in my mind. Generally speaking, to is stronger than to play, but its attacking and hitting in the table are ok, and the absolute strength of the baseboard.
Shortcomings:
(1) The base plate is relatively thick: this is the most important reason why I finally gave up after burning two pieces. Compared with the plate body with OC less than 6mm, the 6.7mm TO made me unaccustomed. After gluing on both sides, I felt like playing with a sandwich, and with only a hollow handle, it was easy to feel top-heavy after gluing.
⑵ The hand feel is dull: It may also be because the bottom plate is thick, so the ball with small strength is not clear enough, and it feels dull and dull.
3. Stiga EG (Energy Wood):
Advantages:
(1) The arc is easy to get started, and the speed near the middle platform is fast: the two pieces of EG used give me this feeling, and the arc is easier to get started, especially when small and medium-sized forces are not as difficult to control as OC, which makes me confident in grabbing and rushing near the middle platform. Although the strength is not as good as OC, it is faster and fiercer than the upper hand.
(2) backhand pulling is suitable: although it is also a soft five-clip, EG feels much more solid than OC because of its small deformation, so backhand pulling is good, of course, it is better to pull.
Shortcomings:
It requires high power and poor borrowing power: the same 88 grams, my two pieces of EG are very soft, even softer than my two pieces of OC with the same weight. Personally, I think that just because the deformation of EG is much smaller than that of OC, it is faster after hitting the ball, so it looks solid and faster, but solidity and hardness cannot be equated. Therefore, for the statement that EG is perfect for a while,
4. Stiga Carbo 7.6:
It's another classic floor with comprehensive performance and super strength, but there are quite a few people who control it well (there are 8 in our arena). It has the special handle of STIGA, solid, real and pure wood board flavor, which is easy to control (I'm going to buy one now). If you use granular glue, it will be even more powerful. But red and black are heavier. The price is around 6 yuan, which is very reasonable.
5. Cl:
Maybe I should have said it earlier, because I like it too. The king of the small ball era is also the arc weapon of the big ball era. Seven splints, with CR coating, are slightly faster than CL and have higher hardness. They are more suitable for fast break, but they can also be used to draw arc loops, but the fault tolerance is slightly poor. The weight and hardness of the WRB now are changed after adjustment, and the control is much better than before. It is more suitable for playing big balls. WRB-CR is used for fast break and WRB is used for arc loops.
The base strength must be sufficient, the hitting arc is long and low, and it is better to have some control. The playing style is fast break combined with arc. I recommend cl and to
I am a power gene. If you are an equipment enthusiast and happen to be in Beijing, you must know the power gene!
I've been playing with equipment for almost 1 years, and many online evaluation articles are original by me. From the initial abala P5 to the current Boer Carbon and even Alnus cremastogyne, basically these classic boards are used in our arena, so I borrowed them and tested them myself. I hope I can help you!
welcome to discuss my QQ: 887677.