However, after lobbying other countries to refuse to use Huawei 5G, the United States began a domestic clean-up operation, spending $65.438+0.9 billion to dismantle Huawei equipment in remote rural areas, and even made new moves recently, which caused strong dissatisfaction among American operators. What's new in America? What impact has it brought to operators?
654.38+0.9 billion dollars was used to dismantle Huawei.
Friends who are concerned about Huawei's dynamic information know that the United States has put forward a plan. If European countries recognize Huawei's 5G "cyber security threat theory" and unite with the United States to dismantle Huawei's 5G equipment, they will receive a subsidy of 500 million US dollars. As an ally, Britain immediately decided to take the lead in dismantling Huawei's 5G equipment in China. Although this will slow down the progress of 5G construction and consume a lot of manpower, material resources and financial resources, Britain still insists on following in the footsteps of the United States.
In the end, Huawei's European market was frustrated, and Australia, as the first country to openly reject Huawei, is bound to be tempted by the United States and become birds of a feather with it. Moreover, the Federal Communications Commission of the United States recently passed a resolution to extend its claws to the equipment of China operators in China.
The United States will give compensation of $654.38+0.9 billion to operators in remote areas for dismantling and replacing the equipment of China enterprises such as Huawei and ZTE. According to the official estimate of the United States, this operation only needs US$ 6,543.8+0.837 billion, and US$ 6,543.8+0.90 billion in subsidies, which is more than enough. However, this is not the case. Network operators in remote areas are mostly small operators, unable to undertake the replacement of large-scale communication networks, and the cost is much higher than the government's forecast. Therefore, after this bill was passed, it was opposed by many operators.
Repression and escalation
Let's not talk about the progress of the US dismantling plan. We all know that Huawei's mobile phone business is inevitably affected by the shortage of chips, and even falls out of the top five global sales. According to relevant data, Apple's profit in just one quarter far exceeded expectations, exceeding $20 billion. This is because Huawei mobile phones can't provide 5G services due to chip shortage, which leads to Apple's 5G mobile phones earning a lot of money.
However, it seems that the United States is still not satisfied and is determined to completely encircle Huawei. Recently, it was reported that the United States will introduce a new policy to prohibit the government subsidy of $65,438 +0.9 trillion from being used to purchase telecom equipment of companies deemed to pose a security threat to the United States, such as Huawei, ZTE and other China telecom companies.
It is reported that this $65,438 +0.9 trillion was proposed in the American rescue plan promulgated in March this year, aiming at helping American companies build high-quality high-speed networks. In order to ensure that small operators in remote areas put China's equipment dismantling plan in place, the United States increased this requirement. After all, if those operators take advantage of the loopholes and continue to buy Huawei and ZTE equipment with higher cost performance, they will not get this subsidy.
American operators are miserable.
However, the American plan may fail, because the comprehensive dismantling and replacement of equipment is not as simple as those politicians think, and its complexity is like driving these operators to a dead end. This is because the United States is vast and sparsely populated, and the construction in some remote villages is very difficult, so it is difficult to find workers during the epidemic.
Therefore, some large capital operators will not pay attention to this project, and these projects in remote areas can only be completed by small operators, which means that they have to bear great risks. Because the network will be disconnected in the process of replacing equipment, not only the operating cost is high, but also complaints will be made if it is slightly improper.
This irresponsible behavior of the United States will not only delay the process of domestic network construction, but also affect the normal business development of these small operators, which is not worth the candle. But it also shows how powerful Huawei is. Not only is it not listed, but its R&D technology strength also exceeds that of the United States. This makes the United States can only suppress Huawei through the state machine. I believe Huawei will be able to tide over the difficulties with tenacious life!