Probation review defense

The reply to the defense of death sentence review is: the presiding judge, judges: Hunan Wanhe United Law Firm and lawyer Wang accept the entrustment of the parties and are entrusted by our institute to act as the defender of Zhu in this case. According to the basic facts and evidence, the lawyer expressed his defense opinions as follows: 1. The defendant's subjective motivation was intentional injury rather than intentional homicide. Although the victim Zuo Zuhong died in this case, it cannot be taken for granted that the defendant's criminal motive is intentional homicide. First, the defendant said in court that he didn't want to kill the victim. The direct purpose of his going to the victim is to hope that the victim can give him an explanation why he beat his father. Secondly, the defendant's motivation to buy a dagger is also based on the difference in body shape, fearing that he could not beat the victim. At the same time, he bought a dagger for courage, and did not form a clear motive to kill each other with this dagger. Thirdly, in the process of stabbing the victim with a dagger, why did the defendant stab the central bag, heart and other key parts, and whether it would lead to his death? In the tense beating atmosphere at that time, the defendant was not aware of these problems at all. The only thing he wants is to resist the opponent's attack and not let himself lead. At the same time, the defendant is neither positive nor indifferent to the victim's final state of death. Generally speaking, his purpose is only to teach each other a lesson that has certain physical harm. This mentality is only an act of intentional injury, not an act of intentional homicide.