The co-pilot was not sitting, and the girl was PS.
At 2011August 22nd 12, Liu Haizhong, the planning minister and spokesperson of Changhong Group, sent Weibo a rumor: "According to the company's investigation, there is no employee named Deng Jialin in Changhong Group. There used to be an employee named Deng Jialing, but the labor contract was terminated by Changhong in June 5438 +2004 10. "
The Weibo also distributed a photo of "Decision on Dissolving Deng Jialing's Labor Contract": "/kloc-0 was born on June 6, 975, graduated from a technical school, and/kloc-0 joined the company on February 27, 995. She was originally a salesman in Linhai Branch of Marketing Management Headquarters ... Deng Jialing was absent from work for a long time, which was a serious violation of discipline.
"The photo was PS!" On August 22nd, 2065438+0/KLOC-0, Deng Jialin said on the phone that he saw this photo on the Internet a few days ago and there was no response at that time. However, it has been like this by PS since the day before yesterday. He believes that "all competitors do this", which has seriously affected his life.
Deng Jialin emphasized that this photo is so popular on the Internet because of the hatred of the rich and the officials. In fact, he is not a civil servant, nor a state-owned enterprise executive, but a small boss of a private enterprise. He expressed anger at the outflow of illegal traffic photos: "Traffic police shouldn't do this!"
As for the girl on the co-pilot, Deng Jialin said that no one was sitting on the co-pilot at that time, and the girl went up by PS. "I am dealing with this matter, and I will give you a result when I am finished."
Published by Weibo 1.
There is a rumor in Weibo: "Deng Jialin, the owner of the Milk Gate incident, issued a statement through Weibo: The girl who took the bus that day had a heart attack and said that her heart ached. I gave her an emergency massage with my hand to relieve the pain and quickly drove to the hospital, so she was speeding. "
In this regard, "Mianyang Deng Jialin" categorically denied that he "has never made any remarks in any Weibo, this is my only Weibo, and I don't use it very much". It said that this rumor is "all nonsense." The girl is an employee of her company, and now she doesn't work in the company. "We didn't do anything illegal. What did you do by touching it? " He asked in return.
Weibo released 2.
After "Mianyang Deng Jialin", Weibo denied the rumor that he would sue the traffic control department, calling it nonsense. "I recognize this matter. I have confessed to my family and my family has forgiven me. "
2011At 9: 00 on August 22nd, "Mianyang Deng Jialin" once again issued a "solemn statement" through Weibo, claiming that he was not a civil servant, but had indeed worked in a state-owned enterprise, but had resigned for many years, and that "the industry he is currently engaged in has nothing to do with before". The statement once again stressed that the woman involved was not a college student, but an employee of her company. The statement finally stressed, "I don't want to sue any individual or unit."
As "Mianyang Dengjialin" Weibo has no official certification, its authenticity cannot be judged.
Weibo disappears.
The first message from Mianyang Deng Jialin Weibo was sent on the morning of June 5th, 2065438 1 1009. Not active, basically forwarding. But yesterday, the number of its fans rose sharply. At the same time, 20 1 1 22, about 10: 35, just when Weibo fans were about to break the thousand, they suddenly couldn't find any more users. Search again shows: Sorry, the user you visited does not exist. Where does the picture come from? It will investigate the source and authenticity of the pictures.
Deng Jialin said that he did not leave the original photo.
At about 20 11on the afternoon of August 22nd1,it was found that there were many traffic violation records in Sichuan BY0008 in recent years. Click on the record, and you can basically see the photos of violations at that time. However, on July 29th, 20 1 1, there were three speeding photos taken by 14: 56, which could not be viewed.
"The picture is not PS, because the incident is still under investigation, and it is not easy to draw a conclusion at present." Relevant persons of the traffic police detachment of Mianyang Public Security Bureau said that they had no right to delete the photos on the intranet.
The investigation has been fully launched.
Yesterday afternoon, the Mianyang Traffic Police Detachment sent a statement to the Chengdu Business Daily reporter entitled "Mianyang police launched a comprehensive investigation on the online" indecent photos "of speeding drivers":
Recently, the photo information of speeding monitoring of BY0008 cars in Santai County (Weibo) appeared on Baidu Post Bar, Tianya Community, Weibo and other networks, which caused the majority of netizens to question. After learning the situation, the public security departments at Mianyang City and County levels attached great importance to it and instructed Santai County Bureau to set up an investigation team immediately. The investigation is now in full swing. The statement is as follows: The public security organ will investigate the source and authenticity of the pictures in this incident. After investigation and verification, the responsible units and responsible persons will be dealt with seriously in accordance with relevant regulations, and will not be tolerated, and the investigation results will be notified to the society as soon as possible. At the same time, the public security organs will further strengthen the management of the city's road monitoring system, especially the comprehensive debugging of monitoring equipment in the trial operation stage, standardize law enforcement procedures, and ensure that the public's personal information is not infringed. Lawyers say publishers and forwards are suspected of infringement.
Lawyer Tao Wei of Taihetai Law Firm believes that, in view of the content and dissemination route of the photos released at present, the publisher forwarded the photos on the Internet without the consent of the parties, so as to let the unspecified public know that according to the relevant legal basis of infringement, it is suspected of infringing the reputation, portrait and privacy rights of the parties. However, judging from the existing evidence, it is impossible to determine the infringer and the responsibility of the traffic police department that keeps the photos.
Tao Wei said that if the party concerned indicated that the photos were synthetic, it would be difficult to determine whether the person who published the original photos intentionally damaged his reputation or was suspected of infringing his reputation. People who synthesize photos and post them on the Internet have damaged the reputation of others and are suspected of openly insulting and slandering, which may constitute a criminal offence. If the traffic police post photos online, it is a personal act and constitutes infringement. For the traffic police department, it is just poor management.