Today, Zhang Jun, the public relations director of Tencent, responded that "knowledge reserve is insufficient and memory is not good". At the same time, Zhang Jun announced the civil ruling of Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court. The content of the ruling was ByteDance's application to freeze the relevant property of Zhixing Weidao (Beijing) Information Technology Co., Ltd.
In this regard, Li Liang, vice president of ByteDance, made a long article on his personal headline, saying that "a case is just the tip of the iceberg. Tencent's abuse of influence is inertial and extensive, and penguins who ate fake Chili sauce accidentally leaked a lot of information. "
Li Liang also said that Tencent attacked its "insufficient knowledge reserve and poor memory" on the grounds that ByteDance had also applied to freeze the assets of other companies. This is a "concept of stealing". He also said that Tencent's abuse of influence is inertial and extensive, and he also listed many "black materials" of Tencent.
Extended data
Experts' views on the incident:
Liu Quan, an associate professor at the Law School of the Central University of Finance and Economics, believes that Tencent and Laoganma may not have fully communicated in advance about the dispute between Tencent and Laoganma. If we communicate in a timely and comprehensive manner through formal channels, it will be easy to find problems, so that one party will not go to court and the other party will report to the public security bureau.
Liu Chunquan believes that Tencent's prosecution is a normal operation. The plaintiff usually sends a dunning letter first, then a lawyer's letter, or goes to court directly without a lawyer's letter. A relatively standardized company like Tencent has reviewed the qualification documents in the course of its operation, and it is generally unlikely that such low-level mistakes will occur. Although Tencent's encounter with such criminals is a small probability event, it is difficult to avoid such a small probability event in practice.
Zhang, a senior partner of Shanghai Dabang Law Firm, believes that such disputes arising from signing contracts with private seals are not uncommon, and most of them will involve criminal crimes such as contract fraud and forging official seals, but those between two famous enterprises are still relatively rare.
"If someone else privately carved the official seal of Laoganma and signed an agreement with Tencent, Laoganma didn't know it. It should be a contract signed under a pseudonym and not binding on Laoganma. The reason why this kind of cases will happen is not only the reasons of criminals, but also the management problems of the company. Of course, the follow-up progress will be judged according to the new facts disclosed by both parties. " Zhang Yulin said.
Liu Chunquan said that there is only the police's statement at present. As for whether Laodopted Mother is at fault, it is still difficult to judge. I don't know if the product pictures of Laoganma with game advertisements are true. If Laoganma has management problems, she may also be responsible.
Phoenix Network-Because of Laodopted Mother, ByteDance and Tencent have a public relations relationship!