Not long ago, a woman in Langfang, Hebei Province walked her dog without tying the rope, causing her pet dog to cry, and the father of the child fell to his death because he was eager to protect his son, which triggered countless netizens' discussions. Some people think that life is at a critical juncture, and the father of the child did the right thing. Others think that the child has not been substantially hurt, and it is too sad for the owner to fall directly to the dog. In this case, I think what the father did was reasonable but illegal. First, the woman in the video said that she didn't hold the rope, but the dog was very docile. At that time, she just licked the child and didn't mean to attack, but the child was scared. Crying, his father came to pick up the dog on the spot and fell to his death. From this point of view, the woman, as the owner of the dog, is indeed responsible for not tying the rope to cause the child to cry. But because the dog didn't hurt the child, she was just frightened, and the child's father immediately executed the dog. From an emotional point of view, this is a sign of the guardian's eagerness, but from an objective point of view, he only considers himself, without considering the woman's mood, the harm she has suffered in doing so, and what responsibility she may have to bear next.
Perhaps this is not popular, so the reporter of "Red Star News" interviewed Zhou Zhaocheng, a lawyer of a law firm in Beijing, and here we intercept some of the lawyer's words to demonstrate my above views.
Of course, it does not belong to self-defense and does not constitute an emergency. The source of self-defense is people, while the source of emergency avoidance is more extensive, including animal infringement. If the dog jumps on the child or even bites the child, it is an emergency to throw the dog to death at this time. But in this case, the pet dog just barked a few times, and the child's father rushed over and killed the pet dog. The behavior is a bit extreme, which belongs to infringement and should bear civil liability.
therefore, impulse is the devil. We can really understand the impatience of fathers when they want to protect their children, but no matter what happens, if we can't rationally judge what we should and shouldn't do in a certain situation, it is likely to bring unnecessary trouble to ourselves.