Why has the art test become a high-risk area for corruption?
1 Corruption is hard to identify.
Yi Shenghua, director of the criminal department of Beijing Yingke Law Firm, believes that there are great subjective factors in the selection of art examinations. Compared with the general college entrance examination, the scores of art examination courses are influenced by the examiner's subjective aesthetic and personality judgment, and it is often difficult to identify corrupt behavior.
An art teacher in a western province revealed that because the examiners are mainly teachers in our school, candidates who take the relationship often find one of the examiners before the exam, agree on the marks and pick out the papers of the candidates who take the relationship to give high marks. Others make biased comments, and other examiners often get the message and give similar scores. This is hard to catch, after all, the art test evaluation is different.
The relationship between teachers and students is very close.
Secondly, in many cases, the main person in charge of the art test has the dual identity of "coach" and "referee". In the art major, the relationship between teachers and students is very close, and the examiner is often the instructor in teaching.
The operation of test sites is often not standardized.
In addition, Huang Youwen, vice president of Guangdong Examinations Institute, said that there are many problems in the independent enrollment of art examinations. Some colleges and universities often operate irregularly in the test sites outside the province, and the test papers are not printed according to the specified time and are not sent as required; Do not report to the provincial admission plan before admission, but only when admission, and adjust the admission quota of "related households" at any time. For example, Liu Gang of Hubei Academy of Fine Arts adopted the method of adjusting the number of admission places from other provinces to include relevant candidates in the enrollment plan.
4 Art test training is linked to the exam
It is particularly noteworthy that the reporter's investigation found that the art examination training class is directly linked to the examination, which breeds chaos. In art test corruption cases, transactions involving money are often realized through training fees. Teachers in some art colleges accept bribes by offering training courses and charging high tuition fees.
For example, in the bribery case of Meng Xinyang of the Central People's University, he not only charged 400,000 class hours for holding a training class, but also asked his teacher to charge candidates a "greeting fee" ranging from 30,000 to100,000 yuan through the pre-test class. The organizers of these pre-test training courses are either teachers in art colleges or teachers who have worked in art colleges, and they are inextricably linked with the school.
How can we not only embody the eclecticism of artistic talents, but also ensure the fairness and justice of enrollment? Chu et al., a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Educational Sciences, suggested: First, break the dual identity of the person in charge of the art test and the over-centralized enrollment power. Professors of specialized courses shall not concurrently serve as evaluators of specialized tests, and establish a professional independent third-party evaluation mechanism and a scientific and reasonable evaluation system design; Second, openness and transparency, video recording of the whole examination, computer monitoring of the whole examination, unblocking all kinds of channels for reporting and complaining, and establishing a traceability system; The third is to cut off the interest chain of the training course, and strictly stipulate that examiners shall not organize and participate in any form of pre-test counseling and training, so as to increase the illegal cost, and offenders will be investigated for legal responsibility.