On April 8, Chongqing No.3 Intermediate People's Court held a public hearing to hear the case. The court found that at about 6: 00 on February 20th, 2009, the defendant Shao Aojie stabbed Zhang Lin's right thigh with a knife because he was dissatisfied with the noise made by Zhang Lin and others in the dormitory of the oil company. At about 20 o'clock that day, when Shao Yaojie went to the vicinity of the former Fuling District Transportation Committee on Renmin West Road in Fuling District, he saw that the pedestrian looked similar to his uncle Shao Jiankang, so he stabbed the left thigh of the document ceremony, and then ran to the office building of the Fuling Central Branch of the People's Bank of China, stabbing the left thigh of the pedestrian Yu Zeng. When Shao ran to the vicinity of Dunren Police Station of Fuling District Public Security Bureau in Chongqing, he met Zhou Xin (male, 30 years old), a policeman of Dunren Police Station. He was dressed in casual clothes and was going home by bus after work. Zhou immediately identified himself as a policeman, seized Shao, ordered him to hand over his hunting knife and wanted to take it to Dunren police station.
Shao stabbed the left and right thighs with a hunting knife. Zhou Xin still insists on it. Shao stabbed him with a knife, stabbed him in the chest and escaped. Zhou fell to the ground after catching up with dozens of meters and died on the way to the hospital. At 2 1 that night, Shao aojie was arrested and brought to justice by the police at his grandparents' home. After forensic identification, Zhou Xin died of hemorrhagic shock caused by aortic root puncture.
During the trial, the defendant Shao Yaojie's defender suggested that the defendant Shao Yaojie was suffering from schizophrenia, and presented Shao Yaojie's disease diagnosis certificate issued by Fuling District Psychiatric Hospital in Chongqing. For the forensic psychiatric appraisal produced by the public prosecution agency, it is considered that the appraisal subject Chongqing Mental Health Center has no valid qualification, and it is applied for re-appraisal of whether Shao Aojie suffers from schizophrenia and whether he has criminal responsibility.
The public prosecutor pointed out that Chongqing Fuling District Psychiatric Hospital is not a psychiatric appraisal institution designated by Chongqing Municipal People's Government, so Shao Aojie's disease diagnosis certificate issued by Chongqing Fuling District Psychiatric Hospital cannot be used as the basis for determining that Shao Aojie suffers from schizophrenia. At the same time, the public prosecution agency also presented the testimony of the doctor in Fuling District Psychiatric Hospital in court, proving that when the doctor diagnosed the defendant Shao Aojie with schizophrenia, he only listened to Shao Aojie's mother's usual performance and did not carry out relevant mental examination, which did not meet the diagnostic procedures of mental illness.
The court held that Chongqing Mental Health Center is a judicial appraisal institution for mental illness designated by Chongqing Municipal People's Government, and its judicial psychiatric appraisal book is legal and standardized, with detailed materials, objective and sufficient analysis and argumentation, objective and true testimony of appraisers in court, and the appraisal book is legal and valid evidence. Based on the objective performance of Shao Aojie, such as clear motive for committing the crime, being able to control his own behavior when committing the crime, having a sense of self-protection after committing the crime, answering to the point in the trial and making a logical statement, the public prosecution agency has sufficient evidence to accuse the defendant Shao Aojie of criminal responsibility and confirm it. Defender's defense opinion that Shao Aojie's forensic psychiatric appraisal conclusion is invalid and requires re-appraisal is not accepted.
In addition, the defendant Shao Aojie's defender suggested that Shao had a good attitude of pleading guilty and showed remorse, requesting a lighter or mitigated punishment. After investigation, Shao Aojie was able to confess the acts that caused the ceremony and killed Zhou Xin during the trial, but he still pleaded guilty. However, the defendant Shao Aojie's criminal circumstances are bad, his means are cruel, and the consequences are extremely serious. He cannot be given a lighter or mitigated punishment, and he will not be given a lighter punishment according to law. Therefore, the defender's defense opinion will not be adopted.
The court held that the defendant Shao Aojie injured others at will with a knife, disturbing public order, and the circumstances were bad, which constituted the crime of seeking trouble; In order to resist arrest, Shao Aojie stabbed the police who stopped his illegal behavior with a knife, causing death, and his behavior constituted the crime of intentional homicide. The charges charged by the public prosecution agency were established. Shao aojie committed several crimes and should be punished for several crimes.
After the verdict was pronounced, the defendant Shao Yaojie said in court that he would appeal.