Does the live broadcast of lawyers' court debates without lawyers' consent constitute infringement of their copyright?

If it is not used for commercial purposes, it does not constitute infringement. According to Article 11 of China's Criminal Procedure Law, the people's courts shall hear cases in public, except as otherwise provided in this Law. The defendant has the right to be defended, and the people's court has the obligation to ensure that the defendant is defended.

Article 183 The people's courts shall hear cases of first instance in public. However, cases involving state secrets or personal privacy shall not be heard in public; Cases involving commercial secrets may be heard in private upon the application of the parties.

For cases that are not heard in public, the reasons for not hearing in public shall be announced in court.

According to Article 134 of China's Civil Procedure Law, the people's court shall hear civil cases in public unless it involves state secrets, personal privacy or otherwise provided by law.

Divorce cases and cases involving commercial secrets may be heard in private upon the application of the parties.

According to Article 45 of China's Administrative Procedure Law, the people's courts try administrative cases in public, except those involving state secrets, personal privacy and other provisions of the law.

The lawyer's debate and defense speech belong to the debate session of the court, and both belong to the public hearing of the court, which is in line with the live broadcast of the public hearing and does not constitute infringement.