First of all, the defendant is a minor and under 14 years old, so it is really puzzling to commit robbery under such circumstances. He committed the crime of robbery, which caused the death of the victim. This is a serious situation. If this happens to an adult, he will be sentenced to a heavy punishment, and the crime of robbery is very large. However, since he was under the age of 14, the Supreme Court also made the victim's family promise not to appeal.
In fact, for minors, our laws are still relatively mild. Personally, I feel that as long as a crime is committed, no matter how small, it should be punished. Otherwise, it may continue to endanger society in the future. There is a saying that bad people get old. In other words, if he is bad at an early age, he will definitely be bad when he is old. If such people are not punished, they will continue to endanger the whole society.
Generally speaking, this kind of punishment is not only for me, but I believe most netizens can't accept it. He should be responsible for his negligent behavior, not exempt from punishment. Maybe he can be held in a juvenile detention center until he is 14 years old. I believe this is also a big blow to him, and he may never dare to make corresponding mistakes in the future.