Judge Zhu Xiaolin of the Civil Affairs Section and Judge Zhang Jianming of the Second Enforcement Section of Shahekou District People’s Court of Dalian City made false claims.

"False judgment" and "false execution announcement", if the situation is true and there is evidence to prove it, then as long as you complain or report to the local Discipline Inspection Commission or Procuratorate, there is no need to publish the news online. And it has no actual effect! A reminder: Don’t sensationalize, don’t fabricate facts, and don’t think the Internet is unregulated. Naming and blaming others online is not the best approach. In fact, our country has designed many channels for accusation or reporting, and you can use legal weapons to protect yourself. If you do this now, you may be suspected of infringing on the reputation of others and you will be held legally responsible. In this world, no judge can cover up the sky with one hand and dare to abuse his power. The law is long-lasting and has no omissions. 1. Article 109 of the Criminal Procedure Law stipulates: 1. Reports, accusations, and reports may be made in writing or verbally. Staff members who accept oral reports, complaints or reports shall prepare a transcript, which shall be signed or stamped by the whistleblower, complainant or whistleblower after being read correctly.

2. Staff who accept complaints and reports should explain to complainants and reporters the legal liability for false accusations and frame-ups. However, as long as the facts are not fabricated or evidence is fabricated, even if the facts of the accusation or report are inconsistent, or even a false accusation, they must be strictly distinguished from false accusations.

3. The public security organs, people's procuratorates or people's courts shall ensure the safety of informants, accusers, informants and their close relatives. If the whistleblower, accuser or whistleblower does not wish to disclose his or her name and reporting, accusation or reporting behavior, they shall keep it confidential.

2. Relevant provisions of Article 397 of the "Criminal Law" 1 on the crime of abuse of power; the crime of dereliction of duty. State functionaries abuse their power or neglect their duties, resulting in heavy losses to public property, the interests of the country and the people If the circumstances are particularly serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years and not more than seven years. If this law provides otherwise, such provisions shall prevail.

Whoever engages in malpractice for personal gain and commits the crime in the preceding paragraph shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention; if the circumstances are particularly serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years but not more than 10 years. If this law provides otherwise, such provisions shall prevail.

2. Article 399: Civil or administrative crimes of perversion of law; crimes of dereliction of duty; crimes of abuse of power in execution of judgments or rulings; intentional violation of facts and laws in civil or administrative trial activities, and the circumstances are serious , shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention; if the circumstances are particularly serious, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years but not more than 10 years.

In the execution of judgments and rulings, serious irresponsibility or abuse of power, failure to take litigation preservation measures in accordance with the law, failure to perform statutory enforcement duties, or illegal adoption of litigation preservation measures or enforcement measures, causing the interests of the parties or others to suffer. Those who cause heavy losses shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention; those who cause particularly heavy losses to the interests of the parties or others shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years but not more than ten years.

If a judicial staff member commits the acts in the first three paragraphs for accepting bribes, which simultaneously constitutes a crime stipulated in Article 385 of the Cost Law, he shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of heavier penalties.