If Ou did not commit suicide in Fujian Putian case, can he get a reduced sentence?

Let's start with the conclusion: the possibility of commutation is very low, but Ou Jinzhong surrendered himself for investigation, and the two sides gave evidence and the court verified it, which can restore the contradictory truth to the maximum extent.

Ou Jinzhong committed suicide for fear of sin, and the motive for killing has been impossible to verify. In other words, whether it is because of the passion of quarreling or the premeditated murder claimed by the victim's family, the focus is on their old, weak, women and children, which are very critical conviction basis.

The version circulated on the Internet and the villagers' statements in interviews are actually just the perspective of onlookers. Ou Jinzhong did have a quarrel with the victim's family at the time of the crime, but this may not be his direct motive for killing. If it's a long-planned killing operation, what preparations Ou Jinzhong made before and what targeted actions need to be taken need my cooperation in the investigation. Unfortunately, this is impossible.

Even if the victim's side is at fault, such as the emotional loss of control caused by door-to-door abuse, the possibility of reducing punishment in Europe can only be that there are remedial operations in the process of killing, or the behavior is suspended without serious consequences. But the reality is two deaths and three injuries, and the child still faces lifelong disability. This consequence is particularly serious in punishment, and the high probability is that the death penalty will be executed immediately.

The only possibility of commutation is that there is a conflict of force between the two sides, and the deceased side has also made a move, but the force is not enough to be killed. In addition, the suspect did not continue to commit crimes after impulsive murder, and there was a plot to surrender. This is usually regarded as a suspended death sentence or life imprisonment. If the deceased's fault is greater (for example, to strike first and use a murder weapon), he may also be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment.

For those who cause heavy casualties (more than two people), the only situation that may exempt the death penalty from immediate execution is the understanding of the family members of the deceased. In the case of Chengdu, Sichuan, the father-in-law killed a son-in-law family of three, and the death penalty was immediately executed in the first instance. In the second instance, the death penalty was suspended because his daughter issued a letter of understanding. Of course, this understanding is also controversial. The daughter forgave her father, not her dead husband's family of three. In theory, this is a situation that close relatives avoid, but the court of second instance actually adopted it, which is a bit confusing. At present, other close relatives of the deceased have filed a complaint and the case has entered the retrial procedure, so whether this funny letter of understanding is valid remains to be determined.

To put it bluntly, as long as the crime of intentional homicide causes heavy casualties, the probability of not being sentenced to death is very small, and even if the other party has a major fault, it cannot constitute a lighter punishment in law.

The version of the dispute circulating on the Internet that bad guys bully honest people has been ruled out by the police's preliminary investigation, so the housing disputes of previous families will basically not be considered as a light sentence for murder.

Moreover, the person killed by Ou Jin has no direct conflict with him, nor is he the most violent neighbor.

Ou Mogui, who has the deepest contradiction with Ou Jinzhong, has been arguing at 1988. Ou Mogui's brother gave the land to Ou Jinzhong, and Ou Mogui blocked him when he built the house. The two sides also had a fight. Ou Jinzhong injured someone with a steel drill and was taken compulsory measures by the police. After that, Ou Jinzhong built a 400-square-meter first suite and lived there for more than 20 years, but the contradiction between the two sides has not been resolved.

On 20 16, ou Jinzhong applied for renovation of the old house. After the formalities were completed, they were stopped by Ou Mogui again, and the two sides had another physical conflict, but it did not rise to a criminal case.

When Ou Jinzhong was repairing a house and digging a mountain road, he dug into Ou Mouyong's land, and the two sides clashed. Ou Mouyong's family joined the battle, and Ou Mouyong's grandfather died because of a sudden illness of the excavator. The two sides went to court. Finally, the excavator driver lost money.

The contradiction between the victim Ou Moufa and Ou Admiralty is actually the smallest, that is, when the wall of Ou Admiralty was built, stones were piled on the land where Ou Moufa made a fortune. The two sides have signed a settlement agreement under the coordination of the village Committee, but Ou Jinzhong's wife did not agree, and finally it was dropped. However, compared with the first two companies, Ou Mougui began to wrangle more than 20 years ago, and Ou Mouyong's grandfather took a life. Ou Mofa is just a small dispute of 2000 yuan.

Therefore, Ou Jinzhong has never been able to build a house. In fact, it is the result of the concerted efforts of three neighbors, Qi Xin, and Ou Mofa is not the main force. Besides, the fault that caused Ou Jinzhong not to build a house was caused by many parties. The local policy to build a new house must be signed by neighbors, and the village Committee has been coordinating without results. The Ou Jinzhong family is unwilling to mediate, which is also one of the important reasons.

Moreover, from a legal point of view, no matter what the fault of not building a house is, it can't hedge the serious consequences of 2 deaths and 3 injuries, so there is almost no possibility of Oujin being given a lighter punishment.