2065438+On March 30th, 2008, Tang Jihai, the first defendant in the Tang case and the father of Tang, issued a lawyer's statement, calling on the Higher People's Court of Heilongjiang Province to reopen the case in time, which once again aroused concern.
On February 8, 20 18, the Higher People's Court of Heilongjiang Province announced that it had filed a case review on whether the complaints of four people, including the complainant Tang Jihai, met the statutory conditions for retrial, but the results of the review have not yet been announced.
On the eve of the Spring Festival in February 20 18, the reporter went to the village where the Tang case was committed. In the case of Tang, people searched a lot of information to infer the truth, such as the environment of the local village and the circumstantial evidence of the people around them. However, during the search, we found that in the northeast village where the case occurred, almost no two villagers could provide completely consistent details. This makes the truth more confusing.
Relatives' views on the Tang case
The Heilongjiang Provincial High Court said that the "Tang case" was being tried according to law. Aunt Tang: Someone complained a long time ago.
On February 7th, Heilongjiang Higher People's Court responded to the previous "Tang case" through the official Weibo. The Heilongjiang Provincial High Court said that they are currently reviewing and handling the complaints of Tang Jihai and others according to law.
On June 3rd, 2008, 14-year-old Tang (pseudonym) wrote a tip-off letter to the police in Longzhen Town, wudalianchi city, Heilongjiang Province, claiming that he was killed by more than ten people, including his father, grandfather, uncle, teacher, village director and fellow villagers, for seven years.
201010/On 20 October, Heihe Intermediate People's Court convicted 1 1 defendants for rape, forced prostitution and whoring with young girls respectively. After the verdict was pronounced, 1 1 The defendant refused to accept the verdict and appealed. On 20121012 6, Heilongjiang higher people's court ruled that the appeal was rejected and the original judgment was upheld.