Hungry? What's the matter with suing Meituan?

From the warm helmet battle to the front, if you are hungry, tell the US group to "choose one". It is said that Meituan requires merchants to settle in their own platforms through various explicit and implicit ways. If you don't cooperate, you will increase your commission and enjoy the support of preferential policies and resources. If so, this behavior of the US Mission is somewhat unclear.

Hungry, ask the court to order the US Mission to immediately stop unfair competition and stop slandering its goodwill and false propaganda; Stop all kinds of coercion on merchants and force them to use the exclusive services of the defendant; For three consecutive months, a statement was issued in a prominent position on the Meituan page to eliminate the impact, claiming 6,543,800 yuan.

If the evidence fully shows the alleged behavior of the US Mission, I am afraid that it will be difficult for the US Mission not to lose the case this time, not only to bear compensation, but also to lose face. Because "Anti-Unfair Competition Law", "Electronic Commerce Law", "Anti-monopoly Law" and other laws explicitly prohibit the "two choices" of e-commerce platforms, this behavior undermines the legitimate market competition order, infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of other businesses in an unfair way, and even threatens the interests of consumers.

Extended data:

Lawyer Feng Yueping of Beijing Shi Jing Law Firm pointed out:

"Platform competition should not be paid by merchants or consumers. Competition is ok, but it should be legal. Competition in the form of infringing on the interests of merchants and consumers, even if it wins temporarily, is difficult to retain customers and bind people's hearts.

If the interests of merchants are infringed by platform competition, they should sue for rights protection in time. Increasing the delivery service fee and other ways to transfer losses to consumers can neither protect their own rights and interests, but may also become an accomplice to illegal competition on the platform. "

Competition is cruel, but consumers' choice is simple and clear. Whoever can provide better service and get richer product choices and consumer benefits will be the winner. Compared with children's secret bullying and inducement, it is better to compete aboveboard. Victory is strength, failure is opportunity.

Phoenix Net-Claim 1 10,000! Hungry, suing the US Mission for unfair competition, another option?