Because the man chose to jump into the river after committing the crime (the suspect has died), it means that the criminal part of the case has automatically ended. With regard to the economic compensation for the civil part, the law stipulates that the offender shall pay compensation, and if the party concerned dies, it shall pay compensation with the personal property of the party concerned. If the children of the parties inherit the inheritance of the parties, they shall be liable for compensation. Those who give up inheritance need not bear the liability for compensation. The court compensated the victim with the personal property of the injured party.
The Civil Code stipulates: Article 161 of the Civil Code: The successor shall pay off the taxes and debts that the decedent should pay according to law within the actual value of the acquired inheritance. The part exceeding the actual value of the estate shall be voluntarily repaid by the heir. If the heir renounces inheritance, he may not be liable for paying off the taxes and debts that the decedent should pay according to law.
The murderer has committed suicide, so there is no need to pursue criminal responsibility. Some friends may ask, in criminal cases, there are many close relatives of defendants who actively compensate the victims for their losses. But this case is very different from those cases. Those close relatives took the initiative to pay the defendant's compensation, not because of their high ideological level, but actively compensated, which may lead to a lighter punishment for the defendant. In this case, the murderer committed suicide himself, and there is no need to pursue criminal responsibility. His relatives have no incentive to take the initiative to compensate.
On the other hand, according to media reports, the murderer's family is not well-off, relatively dull, with little savings, his wife has been ill for a long time and his children have gone to school. It can be said that it is difficult because his neighbors are bullying, his neighbors are eccentric, and the relevant departments are unfair, and so on.
Therefore, it is very unlikely that the victims of criminal cases in this case, that is, the villagers who were killed and injured, can get civil compensation from the relatives of the deceased.