Because the judicial examination has replaced the lawyer qualification examination, you must pass the judicial examination.
After passing the exam, you can get a lawyer's license after one year's internship in a law firm. This is relatively easy, without substantive requirements and supervision. You can find an acquaintance to hang an internship in a law firm (people don't necessarily go), and you can get a lawyer's license after one year.
The success rate is not very high, 10 people can get 1, which is quite difficult, and few people can get it at once!
The subjects of the national judicial examination in 2006 are: jurisprudence, legal history, constitution, administrative law and administrative procedure law, criminal law, criminal procedure law, civil law, civil procedure law, commercial law, economic law, international law, private international law, international economic law, judicial system and legal professional ethics, *** 14 subjects.
Prediction of national judicial examination questions
First, the setting of questions:
1, objective questions: objective questions in previous years were relatively mature and perfect. There are three kinds of multiple-choice questions: single choice, multiple choice and indefinite choice. Even if it is a single-choice question, the topic is deep, the topic is wide, and there are many examination points, let alone multiple-choice questions and indefinite multiple-choice questions. This can test the examinee's judgment, understanding, reasoning and application ability. Moreover, as a fair exam, in the process of marking, objective questions can avoid the intervention of subjective factors of marking teachers.
2. Subjective question: As a qualified lawyer, judge and prosecutor, you must have strong language control ability and legal logical thinking ability, certain judgment, reasoning and the ability to solve problems quickly and correctly. Based on this, many legal experts and scholars insist on strengthening the examination of subjective questions, that is, strengthening the examination of theoretical analysis comprehensive questions.
Question 8 of Volume 4 in 2003 is the most controversial issue in the second judicial examination. The design of this topic is a bold attempt to reform the judicial examination questions the year before last. Its main purpose is to test students' comprehensive analysis ability, written expression ability, logical thinking ability and basic theoretical literacy of law through this question. This is a useful exploration, and it may also become a direction of the reform of judicial examination questions in the future. Because the country needs high-quality legal talents, not only have rich legal knowledge, but also have the ability to solve and deal with problems with legal knowledge, as well as a solid theoretical foundation, theoretical literacy and comprehensive quality in all aspects. This is not only the requirement of the legal practice department for the required talents, but also the expectation of the whole society for high-quality legal talents, and of course it is also the selection goal that the judicial examination should strive to achieve.
Second, the difficulty of the test questions will increase in three aspects:
1. Set more organs and traps in the topic setting to increase the content of confusion and interference.
2. Increase the reading volume and difficulty of test questions. The topic is like a small case. A large amount of reading requires high reading ability, and you can quickly understand the content of the topic and grasp the key words.
There is no material in the title, just saying: "The following statement is true (false)". This kind of topic can be divided into three types: single choice, multiple choice and indefinite choice. Among the four options given, there may be four independent and unrelated test sites, and these four test sites bear joint and several liability. As long as one candidate is inaccurate, even if the other three items are remembered accurately, it is difficult to score this question. This kind of problem involves a wide range and is also the most difficult.
Third, the number of essay questions may be increased to three, and the number of multiple-choice questions may be appropriately increased.
Last year, I took two essay questions, which may be increased to three this year. In addition to the required questions, we can consider increasing the number of multiple-choice questions appropriately, accounting for 10%-20% of Test Paper 4. For example, you can choose between multiple legal document questions or between legal document questions and essay questions. This will help those who are engaged in legal practice to answer according to their own professional direction, increase the chances of passing, and avoid those who are at a disadvantage in the exam and have rich practical work experience from trying again and again, thus truly embodying the main selection function of the judicial examination-selecting legal elites instead of "taking the exam".