How to do a good job in the aftermath of criminal appeal cases

Objectively speaking, it is extremely difficult not to visit after complaining. For the complainant, the criminal appeal procedure is a post-event relief measure and a "last straw", which is of great significance. This kind of psychology can easily lead the complainants to expect too much from the result of the complaint, and once the result makes them dissatisfied, it will lead to pestering the complaint and pestering the visit. (1) Strengthen the legal function of criminal appeal and establish various convenience mechanisms.

The court should give full play to the supervision and restriction of the trial supervision department on its own litigation activities, so that this work can enter a standardized and institutionalized track.

(2) Insisting on handling cases according to law, seeking truth from facts and correcting mistakes are effective ways to prosecute correctly.

Strictly implement the principle of handling cases according to law, seeking truth from facts and correcting mistakes, so as to correct mistakes, mistakes and mistakes, and safeguard correct judgments, decisions and rulings.

(3) Insist on improving the quality evaluation mechanism of criminal appeal cases.

Establish an effective quality assurance mechanism for appeal cases to ensure the quality of handling cases from both substantive and procedural aspects. Curb the occurrence of re-appeal from the source.

(4) Persist in mobilizing the whole society to do a good job in litigation.

When dealing with the aftermath, we should not only do a good job of complaining about the complainant, but also do a good job of complaining about the complainant's family and people around him. When necessary, we can use the strength of local party committees, governments and other organizations to intensify interest litigation. You can also invite deputies to the National People's Congress, well-known lawyers and relevant personnel to give evidence and reply, effectively improving the credibility of the review decision and enhancing the persuasiveness of the reply.

(5) It is suggested to limit the time and frequency of complaints.

In legislation, it is suggested that the time and frequency of criminal complaints should be clarified, which is conducive to saving litigation costs and improving litigation efficiency; It is also conducive to exercising legal jurisdiction and avoiding repeated complaints and entanglement by complainants.

(six) improve the quality of handling cases, and strive for Excellence.

Insist on a comprehensive review of all appeal cases. Review clearly, and finally draw the correct review conclusion, so as not to waste or be vertical.

(seven) to explore and practice the victim rescue mechanism.

A system of assistance for criminal victims will be implemented. The government will give appropriate assistance to criminal victims whose lives are difficult because of being killed and the defendant is unable to pay compensation, so as to solve the complainant's practical difficulties and urge them to lodge a complaint.

(eight) to establish a case diversion mechanism in line with the principles of litigation.

Diversified handling methods and effective appeal channels can reconcile the contradiction between heavy appeal workload and high settlement rate. Through risk early warning, other social forces, such as village committees, neighborhood committees and lawyers' associations, are introduced. , fully explain the law and reasons, and actively guide the parties to withdraw their complaints.

(nine) the implementation of multi-party linkage early warning, fully protect the right to appeal.

Establish a linkage mechanism between departments, a risk assessment system and a filing system for letters and visits involving inspection, so that case information with letters and visits risks can be shared among departments. Improve the system of informing victims of prosecution and fully protect victims' litigation rights.

(ten) the establishment of malicious complaints, unreasonable litigation governance mechanism.

For major and difficult cases, especially unreasonable letters and visits, you can invite NPC deputies, people's supervisors, CPPCC members, legal experts, lawyers, parties and their close relatives, units or grassroots organizations to participate in public hearings and answer questions, and rely on social forces to do a good job in resolving contradictions and disputes, so as to achieve the effect of stopping visits and lawsuits.

(eleven) to strengthen the professional training of criminal appeal investigators.

(twelve) to strengthen publicity and education, reduce unreasonable criminal complaints.

Do a good job in the ideological work of criminal suspects and defendants in handling cases, truly make them plead guilty and obey the law, and reduce the occurrence of criminal appeal cases from the source.