Can a lawyer who entrusts a lawyer to represent the case help to urge the judgment?

The lawyer representing the case lawyer can help to urge the judgment. If the case has not been decided for a long time after the trial, the lawyer can urge the judgment to the presiding judge.

Generally, judges are disgusted with lawyers' urging judgment, because they are engaged in legal work. Judges generally think that lawyers know what their duties are, and it is not for lawyers to make judgments in court. The law has legal provisions and internal assessment provisions. If the internal assessment stipulated by law can't make him feel urgent, lawyers are even more nonsense. It is more polite and considerate for the parties to call the judge themselves. Many judges think that lawyers are anxious to make a judgment for their own benefit and want to close the case early.

In fact, in practice, lawyers often urge judges, and even go to the court to ask the judges to urge them in person. However, when the court makes a final judgment, it has little to do with whether the lawyers urge them or not. The lawyer's urging is also an explanation to the client. Many clients tell him that it is useless for me to urge, and he doesn't believe it.

Many parties always blame the lawyer for the inefficiency of the court in dealing with problems, the lawyer for the judgment that the court can't come out, and the lawyer for the ineffective execution of the court. In fact, they all know the truth, who is responsible for who is responsible, the judge does not judge that you have the strength to submit to the court, and how can the lawyer compete, and how can you urge the lawyer not to write the judgment?

In addition, remember that the final judgment was written by the judge. Don't make a scene in court before the judgment comes out, which is good for you. It is still two different things to judge and the other party to perform the judgment. If the loan is overdue, think of other ways first.