The Nanshan District Court did not consider the contract to be false. What is a liar?

Tencent's lawsuit against Laoganma has escalated again. Some time ago, Guiyang Public Security Bureau issued a notice. After their preliminary investigation, several suspects who were suspected of reselling Tencent's online game packages in promotional activities pretended to be Laoganma staff and signed relevant agreements with Tencent. Laoganma? Staff, so several people have been criminally detained for investigation.

Prior to this, in the case of Tencent v Laoganma's service contract dispute, a people's court in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province ruled to seal up and freeze many properties of Laoganma, which triggered discussion among netizens on the Internet.

Now, Guizhou police have announced that Tencent has really been cheated. How should the judgment of Nanshan District Court be handled? Why didn't Nanshan District Court admit that the contract signed by Tencent was forged?

According to the information of China Judgment Network, the plaintiff Tencent Company applied to Shenzhen Nanshan District Court for property preservation, requesting to seal up and freeze the assets under the names of Laoganma Flavor Food Sales Co., Ltd. and Guiyang Nanming Laoganma Flavor Food Co., Ltd., and an insurance company in Xinjiang and Shenzhen PICC P&C Company provided credit guarantee for this case.

The Southern Court of Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province found the plaintiff's application legal, so it ordered the seizure and freezing of tens of millions of bank deposits in the names of the defendants Laoganma Flavor Food Sales Co., Ltd. and Guangxi Laoganma Flavor Food Co., Ltd., or the seizure and seizure of other property with the same value.

Lawyer Zhang, a law firm in Beijing, said that the civil judgment of Nanshan District People's Court found that more than 10 million assets of Laoganma Company/KLOC-0 were preserved, but this did not mean that Tencent won the case. Property preservation ruling is different from winning the case. As long as the application for property preservation is based on certain facts and a guarantee is provided, the court must make a ruling in time. Tencent submitted the corresponding guarantee, and Nanshan Court finally made a preservation ruling.

According to the relevant laws and regulations, if the judgment is difficult to execute or causes other damage due to the behavior of one party or other reasons, the people's court may, upon the application of the other party, order its property preservation, specific behavior or prohibit specific behavior. According to the relevant regulations, after accepting the application, the people's court must make a ruling within a time limit and order it to take preservation measures, which should be implemented as soon as possible.