Questioning Li Yifan’s verdict: Li Yifan was sentenced to three years in prison for traffic accidents, to be served outside prison.

Recently, there have been widespread rumors on the Internet about the outcome of the first instance verdict in the Li Yifan case:

Li Yifan was sentenced to three years in prison for traffic accidents, to be executed outside the prison.

Li Yifan was fired from the internship unit, and Li Gang was transferred to another branch as deputy director.

Zhang Jingjing has been placed under house arrest by Hebei University and the North Branch of Baoding Public Security Bureau, and is not allowed to be interviewed by any media reporters.

At the same time, Hebei University has insured all female students (now freshmen) in the same dormitory as the deceased and the injured.

According to legal procedures, this news is completely illogical and makes no sense:

1. Li Yifan was just arrested on October 24, 2010. Typically, the first trial takes place two or three months later.

2. Regarding execution outside prison. According to Article 214 of the "Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China", criminals who are sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment or criminal detention may be temporarily served outside prison under any of the following circumstances: (1) Suffering from serious illness and need to Those on medical parole; (2) Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding their babies.

Criminals who are sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment or short-term detention and cannot take care of themselves can temporarily serve their sentences outside prison as long as they do not endanger society. Criminals who are temporarily serving their sentence outside prison shall be executed by the public security organs in the place of residence. The execution agencies shall strictly manage and supervise the execution, and grassroots organizations or the criminal's original unit shall provide assistance.

How was Li Canyifan executed outside prison? Moreover, it is impossible for the court to directly make a judgment of "execution outside prison" in the first-instance case.

3. This case should be considered a traffic accident crime. Article 133 of the "Criminal Law" stipulates that anyone who violates traffic rules and causes a major accident, causing serious injury or death or causing heavy losses to public or private property, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention; anyone who escapes after a traffic accident or is subject to other special If the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years; if his escape causes death, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than seven years.

In this case, Li Yifan was drunk, escaped, and died. The circumstances are quite serious and do not meet the sentencing range of less than three years (including three years).

4. The news that all the female students in the dormitory of the dead and injured will be guaranteed postgraduate education is really speechless. It seems that fake news also believes that diplomas are more important than human lives.

5. The judgment of Li Yifan on the crime of traffic accident will never involve the job transfer of his father Li Gang, nor will it involve the job security of relevant students at Hebei University.

The law is serious, especially the judgment. No matter from the words to the content, the judgment cannot be relaxed. The content of this judgment circulating on the Internet is really ridiculous.

To sum up, the "Li Yifan's First Instance Judgment" that has been widely circulated on the Internet recently is pure fiction and pure nonsense.

Didi’s identification is completed.

Another one:

I wonder if you still remember the Zhang Jinzhu incident in Zhengzhou more than ten years ago? Zhang Jinzhu is a small boss in the Zhengzhou public security system. He also died because the victim was run over and dragged several hundred meters under his car after a drunk driving accident. He just didn't know it because he was drunk.

More than ten years ago, the legislation on traffic accidents caused by drunk driving was far less stringent than it is now. However, because Zhang Jinzhu offended a CCTV reporter, he was caught by "Focus" after the incident and created public opinion. In the end, Zhang Jinzhu was sentenced to death.

Didi was in the third grade of junior high school at the time. After learning that Zhang Jinzhu was sentenced to death, he was deeply disappointed for a long time. Didi realized for the first time the power of public opinion to kill people, and wrote a long legal opinion with strong personal feelings about this incident (Didi gave the legal opinion to his father, a lawyer, to read at the time. Didi wrote his first legal opinion when he was 13 years old). So more than ten years have passed and the memory is still fresh.

Compare the Zhang Jinzhu incident more than ten years ago with the current Li Yifan incident: they were both drunk traffic accidents, also caused serious consequences of death, were also exposed by CCTV media, and also caused a great stir in society. big public opinion.

More than ten years ago, Zhang Jinzhu was sentenced to death due to lax legislation and judiciary.

In today's world where the law is becoming increasingly sophisticated and rigorous, how was Li Canyifan sentenced to three years in prison and served outside prison?