-
And look at this part 1, Xu was murdered.
Time: Tang Dynasty
Persons involved: Wu Zetian, Zhao Shiyuan, Xu, Liu Zongyuan.
Criminal suspects: Zhao Shiyuan and Xu.
Victims: Zhao Shiyuan and Xu Shuang.
Place of death: post office
Lawyers: Chen Ziang, Liu Zongyuan.
Reason: Xu's father was killed by Zhao Shiyuan, and Xu deliberately avenged his father.
Judging from the present situation, according to Article 30 of the Criminal Law, it was sentenced, but there was no past, and it was even said that it was necessary to escape.
-Confucian classics are recorded? Xia Zi asked Confucius in The Book of Rites Tan Gong (the original text can be Baidu O(∩_∩)O)
Xia Zi: What should we do with the enemy who killed his parents?
Confucius said: If you meet an enemy, you should kill him immediately-if you have no guy, you should copy him. No guy, just fight with his bare hands. Killing your father is not a mortal.
The Book of Rites is a "classic" in the imperial examination textbooks of the Tang Dynasty, with a high status and many people studying it.
Then the difficulty comes, whether to kill people according to the "law" or to kill their father's enemies according to the "ceremony".
The question was thrown to Wu Zetian, who was also embarrassed and said not to let it go. Someone below jumped out and said, "No!"
Chen Ziang, the lawyer! He pointed out:
(Maybe it was intentional homicide. The case is clear. According to the national law, he should be sentenced to death, but the national law does not depend on it. But think about this boy's revenge for his father. His filial piety is touching and understandable. I suggest to praise him with great fanfare after killing him.
In this way, regardless of the etiquette has been solved, it seems quite reasonable at first glance. This praise is recorded in the Biography of Chen Ziang, and there is a sentence at the end of the article
Please attach my article to the relevant legal provisions, which will always be a part of the national code.
Lawyer Liu Zongyuan appeared! Sit still, stood up and began to refute:
The meaning of ceremony is to prevent chaos and prohibit the indiscriminate killing of innocent people. If the father is guilty and should be killed, the son should not retaliate; If you retaliate, you will be sentenced to death.
The significance of the law also lies in preventing chaos and prohibiting the indiscriminate killing of innocent people. If Zhao Shizhen kills innocent people, he should also be sentenced to death. Then the question is coming. What is the reason why Xu Yuanqing's father was killed by Zhao Shizhen? I have done it in the Book of Rites and the Biography of Rams, all of which show that the problem is that the father was killed by enmity and the son can take revenge; The father is guilty and damn, and the son's revenge is immoral; It is nonsense to say that it will always be a part of the national code. We should handle similar cases according to the standards in the biography of the ram, so my article can become a part of the national code. Come on)
-
The second part, Liang Yue murder case.
Time: Tang Xianzong
People involved: Liang Yue, Guo Qin and Han Yu.
Suspect: Liang Yue.
Victim: Guo Qin
Place of death: unknown
Lawyer: Han Yu
Case course
Cases like Xu's are all cases of killing their father. Why not judge them according to Liu Zongyuan's method? Maybe they didn't know which one was right at that time. At this time, lawyer Han Yu opened up new ideas.
In the Spring and Autumn Annals and the Book of Rites, it is not uncommon for a son to avenge his father. No one thinks this is a crime. Why not write it on the clockwork? If it is forbidden in writing, it will hurt the filial son's heart. At that time, filial piety was used to rule the world. How come... Stop writing. Some people always take advantage of the law, and the law is not clear. It depends on the judge. )
Han Yu, what does this mean? It means that it can't be explicitly stipulated, but you can choose "exile" and compromise. The concept of exile is recorded as "foreign country" in Zhou Li.
Since we can't kill him, we can't let him go and have to go into exile.
Part three: Zhao E's personal case.
Time: Eastern Han Dynasty
Persons involved: Zhao, Zhao Jun 'an and Li Shou.
Suspect Zhao.
Victim: Li Shou
Place of death: village head
Lawyer: The imperial court.
Case course
Zhao Jun 'an has three sons and one daughter. I don't know why I was killed by my fellow villager Li Shou. All three sons died of the plague, leaving Zhao E, the married daughter. After all, I didn't kill my dad, but what can a woman do? Li Shou thinks so. Every year, I can see Zhao E sharpening her knife at home and worrying about it every day.
The Biography of Women can really be made into a movie. Too detailed is Gu Long's martial arts novel type.
In fact, the original text is much more detailed than mine, so I will just outline the fighting process.
This Zhao E and Xu are both of that kind. No sooner had I killed someone than I went to the yamen to convict her. Official TM was moved to tears and reported to the court. The court gave a thumbs-up and said that it was well done. Zhao E insisted on sentencing her, and the court was moved to tears and set up a monument for her village, which became an example for everyone.
In fact, I think this story of the Eastern Han Dynasty should be the situation of the previous Tang Dynasty, at least according to the degree of etiquette from strong to weak.
The chivalry of the Han dynasty was very heavy. A meal needs to be returned, and a jealous revenge needs to be returned.
The fourth part IX's revenge
This part is very interesting. Let's get one thing straight. Let's assume that author A's book is classic.
A write a school history: XX is a professor.
When you read a book, you find that Zhang San is a professor and Li Si is a professor. It may be a clerical error or a printing problem, but if you believe in the professionalism of A, you will naturally infer whether A is exaggerating three or criticizing Li Si by changing quantifiers.
I left a passage from Russell at the end of the 002 article, which explained Russell's sentence well.
Let's look at Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty. He likes the biography of rams. Biography of the Ram is of great significance to Chunqiu.
Hou Ji returned to his country.
The explanation of "gone" is that it was destroyed by Qi. Because of revenge, Qi Xianggong of Qi avenged his ninth ancestor.
This Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty is going to engage the Huns, saying that he will avenge the Ninth Five-Year Plan. Generally speaking, there is a saying that carries out the meaning of "going to the big picture" in the biography of the ram, which is well founded.
When Emperor Xuan Di arrived, civil strife broke out in Xiongnu. Most people are talking about a godsend to destroy the Huns, but some people stand up and say no, this person is small.
His argument is that there is a saying in Chunqiu.
Jinshi invaded Qi. Zhigu. Hou died. Naihuan
What does this "return" mean? (This reminds me that the purpose of conquering the military division alliance is to return O(∩_∩)O), and to praise scholars for not attacking countries that are holding funerals.
It happened that Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty did not like the biography of the ram but liked the biography of the hub beam (both were branches of Zuo Zhuan, but the buttons on the same thing were different).
The legend of the hub beam said that "retreat" was a courtesy that was not broken, so Wang Zhi Jr. cooperated with Xuan Di, the Emperor Gaozu of Han Dynasty. For Hou Ji to go to his country, "going" is interpreted as leaving and leaving, not from the perspective of Qi, which is autocratic, and Hou Ji's sages have taken all the people of the country away.
Simply put, the bad guy Zhang San bullied the good guy Li Si. According to the explanation of the biography of hub beam, it can't be said that Zhang San bullied Li Si, but Li Si was bullied.
So it's really improvising to come back and want to be a traitor to control the imperial court and read Zuo Zhuan about the emperor.
Well, this is the first chapter of four stories. Every character is not good or bad. It makes sense to stand in the situation at that time. We can't criticize what the ancients did from the perspective of modern people.
There are many contradictions in etiquette and law in the TV series "Military Division Alliance". How many do you think you can find? (*^__^*)?