Lawyer of Criminal Cases of Feng Dan Public Security Bureau

A year ago, he was detained on suspicion of deforestation. During the trial of the case, the court of first instance found him guilty and sentenced him to three years and two months in prison. Lu Hua appealed from the rear, and the case was sent back for retrial by the court of second instance. On August 16, the Public Security Bureau of Shangnan County, Shaanxi Province decided to change the compulsory measures and take residential surveillance measures for 52-year-old Fang. This decision was made because of a beating at Shangnan County Detention Center. On the afternoon of August 12, Fang was beaten by his cellmates in the detention center and rushed to the hospital. His body was paralyzed from the head down. Who paralyzed him? Family members and defense lawyers provided different answers:

First of all, the family said it was the police.

After the incident, the family said it was the police. Fang reported the demolition compensation and other issues due to his real name. On June 20 18, he took Shangnan County Poverty Alleviation and Development Bureau and Shangnan County Guofenglou Town Government to court. After hearing the case, Shangnan County Court rejected Fang's claim. After losing the case, Fang reported to local officials and petitioned many times online. Just before being detained by the police, he posted on the Internet. The reason why he was detained by the police was that he was detained on suspicion of deforestation. The basis provided by the public prosecution agency is only an appraisal report. There are many loopholes in the appraisal report. There is only the engineer's work permit and signature on the report, but there is no appraisal qualification certificate and official seal of the unit. Many evidences are administrative instructions issued by local grass-roots governments.

Second, the defense lawyer said it was someone in the same cell.

Fang's defense lawyer said after investigation that this was done by people in the same cell. He once asked the detention center for monitoring data, and the detention center refused. The reason for the refusal was not made public. After the defense lawyer contacted the director of the local public security bureau, the answer was only under investigation. However, there are still some doubts about this matter, because according to the law, Lu Hua, the public prisoner of the other case, should have been held in solitary confinement. Why are you locked up with others? It also needs to be answered by relevant parties.