When writing a defense in a criminal case, the charges identified by the defense lawyer are inconsistent with those identified by the public prosecutor. How to defend? In other words, how to write an

When writing a defense in a criminal case, the charges identified by the defense lawyer are inconsistent with those identified by the public prosecutor. How to defend? In other words, how to write an objection? Please advise. It depends on what the charge is, and then analyzes it from the theory of constitutive requirements and concrete reality, and finally draws a conclusion.

For example, if you think it is theft and public prosecution is robbery, the first thing to discuss is that theft is aimed at illegal possession, which is generally manifested in stealing public and private property by peaceful means, while robbery requires violence, coercion or other means to suppress the victim's resistance. After the theft is completed, it is generally necessary to obtain property, and robbery is violent to some extent, so it is not necessary to obtain property to constitute a crime. In this way, if your client didn't hurt anyone, or only slightly, you can use robbery as a defense. Specifically, it is necessary to analyze the case and comprehensively consider the subjective factors of the parties ~

Generally speaking, there will be examples after the text ~