"Based on facts", the facts here must have a significant impact on the case. There is no way to change the facts that have occurred simply relying on the lawyer's explanation and explanation, but this does not mean that the lawyer has no influence on the facts. . It can only be said that the impact here can be considered in terms of the burden of proof. If the parties appear in court on their own, they may often make many admissions that are detrimental to themselves without knowing the law. As attorneys, they will definitely determine the focus of the dispute and present the facts that need to be proved by the other party, instead of "denying" them, but make decisions in their own favor on factual issues.
Second, it has an impact on the application of the law
"With the law as the criterion", the parties' understanding of the law is definitely not as good as that of the lawyers, and in many cases they cannot be treated systematically. The legal provisions mentioned are also ridiculous, so of course the lawyer's greatest influence on the case is in the application of the law. Of course, judges also understand and apply the law. Those who need a lawyer think they do. On the one hand, lawyers can try their best to find legal provisions that are beneficial to them and guide the judge to make a judgment that is beneficial to them to a certain extent. On the other hand, even if they cannot guide the judge to make a favorable judgment, they can use legal provisions to help provide evidence and determine the facts.
Third, different lawyers have different strategies
Of course, different lawyers will have different litigation plans and strategies. We cannot say that Lawyer A is right and Lawyer B is wrong. The parties should entrust a lawyer, and it is best to trust their own lawyer. Protecting the interests of the parties is also protecting your own interests. If you entrust different lawyers in the same simple civil case, it is very likely that there will be some different opinions or even conflicts on litigation strategies. Differences of legal opinion are normal, as long as they have a favorable impact on the outcome of the case.
Legal basis: Article 36 of the "Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China". Starting from the date when the People's Procuratorate examines the prosecution case, defense lawyers may review, excerpt, and copy the litigation documents and technical appraisal materials of the case, and may meet and communicate with criminal suspects in custody.