Case analysis of Shanxi lawyers' criminal defense

Sun was born on1May 5, 986. On October 6th, 2002, Kloc was criminally detained by a county public security bureau on suspicion of intentional homicide after drinking. On October 25th, 65438/kloc-0, the Public Security Bureau made a decision to arrest (1, the arrest decision was overtime). Subsequently, Sun's classmate Wang, a law student at school, was entrusted by Sun's family to ask the Public Security Bureau to do the marking work (eight defenders can only go to the court to do the marking work, but not during the investigation) and was approved (two can do it directly without approval). On June 20, 2003, the Public Security Bureau transferred the case to the A County Procuratorate (3. The public security investigation should make sure that it is within 65 June of 438+0, which is overtime). After examination, the procuratorial organ considers that the age of the defendant is wrong, but the facts of intentional homicide are clear. (4) Additional investigation should be made. So on April 5, 2003, he filed a public prosecution with the A county court (5 may be sentenced to death, under the jurisdiction of the intermediate court). A county court found that Sun's behavior was 16 years old or older, and on August 8, 2003, he was sentenced to death (6 trials worked overtime), with a two-year suspension. Wang refused to accept and appealed on behalf of Sun. (7) Defenders cannot appeal directly without the consent of the defendant. The court of second instance rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment. After the verdict, Sun was put in prison for execution.