1, in June, 2007, 1 sent the Review Opinion of the State Council, arguing that the State Council has no right to formulate the measures, and suggested that the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) formulate them.
2. In June 2007, 5438+ 10, Cangzhou 15 lawyers jointly wrote to the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC), suggesting "review.
3. In March, 2007, the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) submitted a Letter for Review, on the grounds that the Regulation was in conflict with the National Standardization Law.
In the State Council.
On June 5438+0 and June 5438+00, 2006, I wrote to Premier Wen, saying that it was difficult to meet a lawyer because the Regulations of People's Republic of China (PRC) Detention Center conflicted with the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), and suggested that the State Council amend it.
2. In March 2007, the State Council wrote, "Change or cancellation, < Measures for the Administration of National Standards for Engineering Construction by the Ministry of Construction and < Measures for the Administration of Standardization by the Ministry of Agriculture > 3. Regulations and
3. In June 2007, the State Council wrote the Review Proposal of the Ministry of Public Security, on the grounds that this provision was in conflict with China's administrative punishment law and administrative licensing law. The reply will be studied and processed by experts.
4. On May 1 2008, the Report and Suggestions on Government Information Disclosure was submitted to the State Council. State Councilor Ma Kai instructed that the content of the proposal was basically solved.
5. On May 23rd, 2008, the State Council received a "Written Proposal on Suggesting the State Council to Standardize" Flags at Half-mast "in the form of laws and regulations.
6. On June 6, 2008 165438+20081October 6, 2008, the legislative proposal on Microsoft's black screen incident was submitted to the State Council.
7. On June, 2009 165438+ 10/8, I wrote a letter to the State Council, "Suggesting Qian Xuesen to fly the flag at half-mast", and attached "Suggesting the State Council to regulate" flying the flag at half-mast ".
8. 201213 He wrote to the General Office of the State Council, proposing to amend the Notice of the General Office of the State Council on Some Holiday Arrangements in 20 13.
With national ministries and commissions
Since 200 1, Han Fu has directly or indirectly dealt with more than a dozen ministries and commissions in the State Council through public interest litigation or suggestions. On May 2008 1, the reports and suggestions related to the disclosure of government information were put forward to the State Council by the AQSIQ, the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Urban and Rural Development, and were actively rectified under the instructions of the leaders of the State Council, which was an indirect way. The following is simple and clear:
1 and 200 1 In May, for the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, they wrote to the leaders of the then Ministry of Information Industry and the State Planning Commission, saying that China Telecom and other "rest days" charged long-distance telephone charges at full price, demanding that measures be taken to correct them.
2. From 200 1,1,China Telecom and other "rest days", the long-distance telephone charges were charged at full price, and they went to the State Planning Commission for administrative reconsideration procedures, and then they went to Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court for prosecution, but the court refused to accept them.
3. On June 5438+ 10, 2002, the Ministry of Railways filed an administrative reconsideration procedure for the violation of the statutory limit of 40,000 yuan in the Provisions on Compensation for Railway Passenger Transportation Damage due to legal aid to a case of compensation for railway transportation damage, and the Ministry of Railways replied. Because this regulation was approved by the State Council, it will be revised according to relevant procedures. In July, 2007, the State Council changed the compensation amount of 40,000 yuan that has been implemented to 13 to150,000 yuan.
4. In March 2002, in order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, he applied to the Ministry of Information Industry for administrative reconsideration, asking him to take specific administrative actions against China Telecom Group and others for canceling the "rest day" domestic long-distance telephone charges by half. Later, he took administrative proceedings, which were not accepted by the court.
5. In March 2002, for the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, the State Planning Commission, the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Information Industry respectively went through administrative reconsideration procedures, requiring them to modify or abolish the provisions of the four-level monthly fee for fixed telephones. After administrative litigation, the court will not accept it.
6. Since September 2005, for the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, for the dignity of the law, etc. We have been to the former National Cultural Heritage Administration on issues such as not using "standardized Chinese characters" and violating the Law of the State on the Common Language and Characters. The former scaa accepted my request and began to correct the problems in the air ticket from June 1 2006. The problem of nonstandard Chinese characters in domestic air tickets in China for more than 20 years has been basically solved.
7. In March 2007, in order to break the monopoly of national standards by relevant administrative departments for profit in recent 20 years, and enable citizens to freely and conveniently use all kinds of national standards, they filed an administrative reconsideration with the AQSIQ, asking it to release all national standards to the whole society in accordance with the specific provisions of the National Standardization Law, so as to fulfill their legal duties of protecting consumers' legitimate rights and interests. Later, he took administrative proceedings, which were not accepted by the court.
8. In May 2007, in order to standardize the administrative fees and promote the early enactment of the administrative fees law, the former Civil Aviation Administration conducted reconsideration and administrative litigation on the airport construction fee, which was finally accepted by the court, and the Beijing High Court ruled that Han Fuzheng lost the case. Han Fuzheng failed to shake the "airport construction fee" that has been implemented for 15 years. This case is the first administrative lawsuit of airport construction fee in China.
9. On June 5438+ 10/0, 2008, in order to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of hundreds of millions of consumers, the company applied to the National Development and Reform Commission and the former Ministry of Information Industry to cancel the monthly subscription fees for fixed and mobile phones;
10, 2008126 October 65438+ In order to protect consumers' right to price hearing, etc. , submitted the "Proposal on Formulating Specific Measures for Consumer Entrusted Application for Price Hearing" to the National Development and Reform Commission. On February 5, the National Development and Reform Commission replied, "We are revising the" Measures for Hearing Government Price Decisions ",which will be clarified in the new hearing measures. "
1 1, 2008 10 15 In order to safeguard the rights and interests of workers at work, a proposal was put forward to Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security to formulate unified and standardized regulations on work-related injuries.
12, April 23, 2009, in order to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of hundreds of millions of consumers and promote the disclosure of government information, an application for the disclosure of government information was issued to the National Development and Reform Commission, requiring the National Development and Reform Commission to disclose the monthly interval of supervision and examination of mobile phone charges and its cost supervision and examination report.
On April 23rd, 2009, 13, an application for the disclosure of government information was issued to the Ministry of Commerce for taxpayers' rights and legal dignity, requiring the Ministry of Commerce to disclose the legal basis for the posts of eight deputy ministers and five assistant ministers, as well as all recurrent expenditures, salaries and office expenses in the previous year, on the grounds that the number of deputy ministers and assistant ministers in the Ministry violated the provisions of Article 9 of the Organization Law of the State Council. The Ministry of Commerce replied in writing that his position was appointed in accordance with legal procedures, and others were also implemented in accordance with laws and standards.
14, June, 2009 15, submitted a proposal to the Ministry of Finance to cancel the shortlisted official vehicles of BMW and Mercedes-Benz. The Ministry of Finance replied that it has been transferred to the relevant business department of the Ministry of Finance for study. Later, I promised to the society that domestic brands were the first choice for official cars.
15, July, 2009 1, in order to protect consumers' rights and regulate government administrative actions, an application for disclosure of government information was submitted to the National Development and Reform Commission on June 30th, requesting the disclosure of the calculation method and method of 22 working days in refined oil price adjustment and the supervision and examination report of refined oil cost.
On July 5, 2009 16, it requested the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) to cancel the price adjustment of refined oil products on June 30, and suggested that the NDRC publicly apologize. In this regard, the National Development and Reform Commission specifically explained to the public.
20 17, 20 10, 1, for the sake of the dignity of the law and the perfection of the Law on the Protection of Cultural Relics, an application for the disclosure of government information was sent to National Cultural Heritage Administration, asking it to disclose the government information about Cao Cao's tomb according to law and the identification standards of Cao Cao's tomb. The Cultural Relics Bureau publicly replied on its website on the 28th.
On February 3rd, 18 and 20 10 refused to accept the reply of the Cultural Relics Bureau, and filed an administrative reconsideration with National Cultural Heritage Administration on the grounds that National Cultural Heritage Administration agreed to identify or found the "Cao Cao's Tomb" procedure illegal and invalid.