Investigation behavior in criminal investigation

Investigation behavior refers to all kinds of special investigation activities carried out by investigation organs in the process of handling cases according to law. There are seven kinds of investigation behaviors stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Law: (1) The concept and significance of interrogating criminal suspects.

Interrogation of a criminal suspect refers to a kind of investigation behavior in which investigators ask the criminal suspect the facts of the case in words according to legal procedures.

Interrogation of criminal suspects, on the one hand, is conducive to finding out the facts of the crime, expanding the clues of collecting evidence, and discovering new crimes and other criminals who should be investigated for criminal responsibility; On the other hand, by listening to the defense of criminal suspects, we can ensure that innocent people and others who should not be investigated according to law are not subject to criminal investigation.

Interrogating a criminal suspect is also called investigation interrogation. Investigation and interrogation is not only a system or procedure in criminal proceedings, but also a method of investigation. Charles O 'Hara, an American investigative scholar, said, "There are three methods of investigation, namely, criminal intelligence, material evidence appraisal (that is, judicial appraisal) and investigation interrogation."

"Investigation and interrogation is a method by which the investigation organ obtains criminal intelligence and information from the interrogated person through the interrogator, and then finds out the facts of the case." It is the task of investigation organs and interrogators to collect criminal evidence in a timely and comprehensive manner, identify criminal facts and investigate criminal suspects. Only by mastering scientific methods and theories of investigation and interrogation can interrogators complete the task of investigation and interrogation efficiently on the basis of fully protecting their legitimate rights and interests.

(2) Procedures and methods for interrogating criminal suspects

1. Interrogation of criminal suspects must be conducted by investigators of public security organs or people's procuratorates. In order to improve the efficiency of interrogation, ensure the quality of interrogation, prevent violations of law and discipline, and ensure the safety of interrogation, there shall be no less than two investigators during interrogation.

2. For a criminal suspect who does not need to be arrested or detained, he may be summoned to the designated place of the city or county where the criminal suspect is located or to his residence for interrogation, but he shall produce the certification documents of the public security organ or the people's procuratorate. The maximum duration of summons and summons shall not exceed 12 hours. The criminal suspect shall not be detained in disguised form by means of continuous summons or compulsory summons.

A criminal suspect who has been detained or arrested shall be interrogated within 24 hours after detention or arrest. If it is found that he should not be detained or arrested, he must be released immediately.

3. When interrogating a criminal suspect, investigators should first ask whether the criminal suspect has committed a crime.

If a criminal suspect admits a crime, let him state the guilty circumstances; If the suspect denies the facts of the crime, let him state a plea of innocence, and then ask the suspect questions according to his statement.

A criminal suspect shall truthfully answer the questions of investigators. However, you have the right to refuse to answer questions irrelevant to this case. Whether it has nothing to do with this case should be based on finding out all the facts of this case, that is, time, place, methods, means, motivation, purpose and the situation of the actor, whether it has practical significance or evidence value.

4. Interrogation of deaf-mute suspects should be attended by people familiar with deaf-mute gestures, and this situation should be recorded in the record. When interrogating a juvenile criminal suspect, he may notify his legal representative to be present. If a criminal suspect is not familiar with the local common language, he shall translate it for him.

5. Interrogation of criminal suspects should be recorded. The record shall truthfully record the situation of the questioner, the respondent and other people present. The written record shall be checked by the criminal suspect. If there is no reading ability, it shall be read out to the criminal suspect. If there are omissions or errors in the record, the criminal suspect may make additions or corrections. The criminal suspect shall sign or seal his name after admitting that it is correct in the record. Investigators should also sign the records. If a criminal suspect requests to write his own confession, it shall be allowed. When necessary, investigators may also ask the criminal suspect to write a confession in person.

6. Interrogating criminal suspects, it is forbidden to extort confessions by torture, and it is not allowed to induce confessions, cheat confessions or ask confessions by name. A criminal suspect has the right to sue a person who extorts a confession by torture; If a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law.

(3) The suspect hires a lawyer.

According to Article 96 of the Criminal Procedure Law and the Provisions of the Six Organs, after a criminal suspect is interrogated for the first time or from the date when compulsory measures are taken, investigators should inform him that he can hire a lawyer to provide legal advice and represent him in complaints and accusations. If a criminal suspect hires a lawyer, the criminal suspect himself or his relatives may hire him on his behalf. If a criminal suspect in custody proposes to hire a lawyer, the detention organ shall timely convey his request to the relevant investigation organ handling the case, and the relevant investigation organ shall timely convey his request to the person entrusted by him or his law firm. If a criminal suspect only wants to hire a lawyer, but can't mention the specific object, the investigation organ shall promptly notify the local lawyers association or the judicial administrative organ to recommend a lawyer for him.

In cases involving state secrets, the criminal suspect's employment of a lawyer shall be approved by the investigation organ. A case involving state secrets refers to a case or a case involving state secrets, which cannot be identified as involving state secrets because the relevant materials and handling opinions in criminal case investigation need to be kept confidential.

Lawyers hired by criminal suspects in custody shall be allowed to apply for bail pending trial if they meet the statutory requirements. The organ that has the right to decide shall make a reply on whether or not to agree within 7 days. Those who agree to obtain a guarantor pending trial shall go through the formalities of obtaining a guarantor pending trial according to law; If he does not agree to obtain bail pending trial, he shall notify the applicant and explain the reasons for his disagreement.

If the entrusted lawyer requests to know about the alleged crime of the criminal suspect and to meet with the criminal suspect, the investigators shall truthfully introduce the alleged crime and allow the meeting, and the investigation organ may send personnel to be present according to the circumstances and needs of the case. When a lawyer meets a criminal suspect in custody in a case involving state secrets, it shall be approved by the investigation organ. For cases that do not involve state secrets, lawyers do not need to be approved to meet criminal suspects. Cases involving state secrets cannot be denied because the investigation process needs to be kept secret. If a lawyer requests to meet with a criminal suspect, he shall arrange a meeting within 48 hours. If a lawyer requests to meet with two or more major and complex criminal suspects such as organizing, leading, participating in underworld organizations, organizing, leading, participating in terrorist activities or smuggling, drug crimes, corruption and bribery crimes, he shall arrange a meeting within 5 days. (A) the concept and significance of questioning witnesses

Questioning witnesses refers to a kind of investigation behavior in which investigators conduct verbal investigation on witnesses in accordance with legal procedures to understand the case.

The purpose of questioning witnesses is to obtain testimony that can prove the facts of the case, find clues to the case through testimony, find suspects and find out the case. Questioning witnesses is of great significance for finding and collecting evidence, detecting cases and proving crimes.

(2) Procedures and methods for questioning witnesses

1. Questioning witnesses can only be conducted by investigators. Before interrogation, investigators should be familiar with the relevant information and materials of the case, understand the identity of the witness and the relationship with the case and the criminal suspect, clarify the purpose of the inquiry, determine the problems that need to be ascertained, and make full preparations.

2. Investigators can go to the witness's unit or residence to question the witness, but they must produce the certificate of the public security organ or the people's procuratorate. When necessary, witnesses may also be notified to testify in public security organs or people's procuratorates. Investigators shall not designate other places when questioning witnesses. The choice of the place where investigators ask witnesses should be considered from the aspects of facilitating obtaining testimony and ensuring the enthusiasm of witnesses to testify.

3. The questioning of witnesses should be conducted separately. This will help to avoid the mutual influence between witnesses and ensure the authenticity of testimony.

4. In order to ensure that witnesses provide evidence truthfully, when questioning witnesses, they should be informed of their legal responsibilities of providing evidence and testimony truthfully, intentionally perjury or concealing criminal evidence. At the same time, investigators should also inform witnesses of all kinds of litigation rights they enjoy according to law to ensure the safety of witnesses and their close relatives. Threatening, insulting, beating or retaliating against witnesses and their close relatives, which constitutes a crime, shall be investigated for criminal responsibility according to law; If it is not serious enough for criminal punishment, it shall be given administrative punishment for public security according to law.

5. Ask witnesses under the age of 18 and notify their legal representatives to be present. You can also choose places that minors are familiar with and used to. This is conducive to protecting the rights and interests of minors, reducing their ideological concerns, eliminating psychological pressure and achieving the purpose of inquiry. When questioning deaf-mute witnesses, there should be someone who knows deaf-mute gestures as an interpreter, and this situation should be recorded in the record. Ask people and foreigners who are not familiar with the local language and writing and hire translators for them.

6. When questioning a witness, the witness should generally be required to give a continuous and detailed account of what he knows and ask the source of the facts. Then, according to his account, the facts that should be ascertained in this case and the relevant situation, ask the witness questions and let the witness answer. Questioning witnesses must ensure that they have the conditions to provide testimony objectively and comprehensively.

7. Records of witness statements should be made, checked by the witness or read out to him. If there are omissions or errors in the record, the witness can supplement or correct them. When a witness admits that there is no mistake in the transcript, he shall sign or seal it, and the investigators shall also sign the transcript. If a witness requests to write his own testimony, it shall be allowed. When necessary, investigators may also ask witnesses to write written testimony.

(3) Ask the victim

Asking the victim refers to the investigation activities in which investigators investigate the victim and the criminal suspect from among the people who are directly harmed by criminal acts according to legal procedures.

The procedure for questioning witnesses applies to questioning victims. But the victim is a party in criminal proceedings, and his litigation status is different from other witnesses. Therefore, when asking, we should not only see that he is the object of direct infringement by criminal acts, but also have more understanding of criminal facts and criminals, and think that he has an interest in this case. We should not only listen carefully to the victim's statement, but also pay attention to whether the analysis is reasonable and exaggerated. The privacy of the victim should be kept secret. Practical measures should be taken to ensure the personal safety of the victims. (A) the concept and significance of the inspection.

An inquest is a kind of investigation behavior in which investigators investigate and inspect places, objects, bodies and people related to crimes. The nature of inquest and inspection is the same, but the objects are different. The objects of investigation are scenes, objects and corpses, while the objects of investigation are the corpses of living people.

(2) Types and procedures of the inquest and inspection.

According to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, the inquest can be divided into five types: on-site inquest, physical evidence inspection, corpse inspection, personal inspection and investigation experiment.

1. Site inspection. On-the-spot investigation is a kind of investigation activity in which investigators investigate and inspect the crime scene of criminal cases. The crime scene refers to the place where criminals commit crimes and other places that leave traces and physical evidence related to crimes.

(1) Protect the site. Article 102 of the Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that all units and individuals have the obligation to protect the crime scene and immediately notify the public security organs to send personnel to conduct an inquest. After receiving the case, the investigators should quickly rush to the crime scene to protect the scene.

(2) When investigating the scene, the investigators must hold the certification documents of the public security organ or the people's procuratorate.

(3) When necessary, personnel with specialized knowledge may be assigned or hired to conduct on-site inspection under the auspices of investigators. In order to ensure the objectivity of the inquest, two witnesses unrelated to the case should also be invited to the scene.

(4) In the process of on-site inspection, investigators should also investigate and interview the victims, witnesses, informants, etc. in time, understand the situation before and at the time of the crime, discover and collect all kinds of information related to the case, and take emergency measures to collect evidence in time.

(5) A record shall be made of the on-site inspection, which shall be signed or sealed by the investigators, other persons participating in the inspection and witnesses. Major cases, especially major cases, should be recorded on the spot.

2. Physical evidence inspection. Physical evidence inspection refers to the inspection and verification of items or traces collected in investigation activities to determine the relationship between physical evidence and the facts of the case.

The inspection of material evidence must be careful. If professional and technical personnel are needed for inspection and appraisal, an appraiser shall be appointed or hired.

When inspecting physical evidence, a record of inspection shall be made, which shall be signed or sealed by the participants and witnesses.

3. autopsy. Autopsy refers to an investigation activity in which a doctor appointed or hired by a forensic doctor or an investigation organ dissects or autopsies an abnormally dead body. The purpose of autopsy is to determine the time and cause of death, tools, means and methods of death, and provide basis for finding out the case and the criminal.

According to Article 104 of the Criminal Procedure Law and the regulations of the Ministry of Public Security, in order to determine the cause of death of a corpse with unknown reasons, with the approval of the person in charge of the public security organ at or above the county level, the corpse may be dissected or opened for examination, and the family members of the deceased shall be notified to be present. The examination of a corpse shall be conducted by a forensic doctor or a doctor under the auspices of investigators. When examining a corpse, detailed records shall be made, which shall be signed or sealed by investigators, forensic doctors or doctors.

4. Physical examination. Physical examination refers to the investigation behavior of examining and testing the victim and criminal suspect according to law in order to determine some characteristics, injuries or physiological conditions. Physical examination is a special examination of living body.

According to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, the physical examination of victims and criminal suspects must be carried out by investigators. When necessary, under the auspices of investigators, forensic doctors or doctors may be hired to carry out their work in strict accordance with the law, and there shall be no acts that insult the personality or other legitimate rights and interests of victims or criminal suspects. When necessary, a physical examination of a criminal suspect may be compulsory. However, the physical examination of the victim should obtain his consent, not compulsory. Women's physical examination should be conducted by female staff or doctors.

A written record shall be made for the personal examination, which shall record the examination situation and results in detail, and shall be signed or sealed by the investigators and the forensic doctor or doctor who conducted the examination.

5. Investigate the experiment. Investigation experiment refers to an investigation activity in which investigators conduct experiments according to the situation and conditions at that time to determine whether or how things related to the case can happen in a certain situation.

According to the relevant provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law and the provisions of the Ministry of Public Security, in order to find out the case, when necessary, with the approval of the public security bureau chief, investigation experiments can be carried out. All dangerous, humiliating or immoral behaviors are prohibited when conducting investigations and experiments.

6. Re-inspection and review. Article 107 of the Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that when examining a case, the people's procuratorate may request the public security organ to review the inquest and inspection of the public security organ, and may send a prosecutor to participate. The purpose of this procedure is to ensure and improve the quality of the inspection, and to prevent and correct possible errors. At the same time, it is also a form for procuratorial organs to carry out investigation and supervision according to law. Review, review can be returned to the public security organs, but also by the people's Procuratorate itself. For those returned to the public security organs, the people's procuratorate may also send personnel to participate. The reinspection and review shall be recorded and signed or sealed by the personnel participating in the reinspection and review. (A) the concept of search

Search refers to a kind of investigation behavior in which investigators search and inspect the bodies, articles, residences and other relevant places of criminal suspects and people who may hide criminals or criminal evidence.

Search is a compulsory investigation measure and an important means for investigation organs to crack down on crimes. It is of great significance to collect criminal evidence in time, expose and confirm crimes, find criminal suspects, combat and stop crimes, and ensure the smooth progress of investigation and trial.

(2) Procedures and requirements for the search.

Search is directly related to citizens' personal freedom and the right to inviolability of their homes. China's Constitution clearly stipulates that it is forbidden to illegally search citizens' bodies and houses. Therefore, the search must be carried out in strict accordance with the procedures prescribed by law.

1. Searches can only be conducted by investigators of public security organs or people's procuratorates, and no other organ, unit or individual has the right to search citizens' persons and houses. The object of the search may be a criminal suspect or other people who may hide criminals or criminal evidence; It can be carried out on the person, or on the residence, articles and other relevant places of the searched person. The purpose of the search is to find and collect criminal evidence and catch hidden criminal suspects. Therefore, search measures should not be abused for other purposes.

2. According to Article 1 10 of the Criminal Procedure Law, any unit or individual is obliged to hand over physical evidence, documentary evidence and audio-visual materials that can prove the criminal suspect's guilt or innocence at the request of the public security organ and the people's procuratorate.

3. When searching, you must show the searched person a search warrant, otherwise, the searched person has the right to refuse to search. The search warrant of the public security organ shall be issued by the person in charge of the public security organ at or above the county level. The search warrant of the people's procuratorate shall be issued by the chief procurator. However, investigators "can conduct a search without a search warrant when arresting and detaining in an emergency". The emergency mentioned here, in the investigation practice, refers to: (1) the person who carries the tools of murder and suicide; (2) It is possible to hide explosive, highly toxic and other dangerous goods; (3) It may destroy or transfer criminal evidence. In these emergencies, it is allowed to search with a detention warrant or an arrest warrant before the examination and approval procedures for the search are completed.

4. When searching, the searched person or his family members, neighbors or other witnesses shall be present.

5. Searching women's bodies should be carried out by female staff. When searching, the property of the searched person shall not be damaged without reason. Personal privacy found in the search that has nothing to do with the case shall not be made public.

6. The search shall be written into a record, which shall be signed or sealed by the investigator and the searched person or his family members, neighbors or other witnesses. If the searched person or his family is at large or refuses to sign or seal, it shall be indicated in the record. (1) The concept and significance of seizing material evidence and documentary evidence.

Seizure of material evidence and documentary evidence refers to a kind of investigation behavior in which the investigation organ forcibly seizes or freezes articles, documents and money related to the case according to law.

The purpose of seizing physical evidence and documentary evidence is to obtain and preserve evidence and prevent it from being damaged or hidden. The timely seizure of material evidence and documentary evidence in accordance with the law is of great significance for verifying evidence, finding out the case, identifying the suspect or denying the crime, and protecting innocent citizens from criminal investigation.

(2) Procedures and requirements for seizing material evidence and documentary evidence.

The seizure of material evidence and documentary evidence is directly related to citizens' rights such as property and freedom of communication, and must be carried out in strict accordance with legal procedures.

1. The seizure of physical evidence and documentary evidence is usually carried out during interrogation or search. According to Article 1 14 of the Criminal Procedure Law, all kinds of articles and documents that can be used to prove the criminal suspect's guilt or innocence found during the inquest and search shall be seized; Articles and documents irrelevant to the case shall not be seized.

2. The seized articles and documents shall be checked clearly with the witnesses present and the holders of the seized articles, and a list shall be made on the spot in duplicate, which shall be signed or sealed by the investigators, witnesses and holders, one for the holder and one for future reference.

3. The seized articles and documents shall be properly kept or sealed, and shall not be used or damaged.

4. When investigators think it necessary to seize the mail and telegram of a criminal suspect, they may, with the approval of the public security organ or the people's procuratorate, notify the post and telecommunications organs to hand over the relevant mail and telegram for inspection and seizure. When it is no longer necessary to detain, it shall immediately notify the post and telecommunications organs.

5. Public security organs and people's procuratorates may inquire and freeze the deposits and remittances of criminal suspects according to the requirements of investigating crimes. If the deposits and remittances of criminal suspects have been frozen, they may not be frozen again.

6. If the seized articles, documents, mails, telegrams or frozen deposits and remittances are found to be really irrelevant to the case, the seizure and freezing shall be lifted within three days and returned to the original owner or the original post and telecommunications organ. (A) the concept of identity and its significance in investigation

Appraisal refers to the investigation activities in which public security organs and people's procuratorates assign or hire people with specialized knowledge to identify and judge some specialized issues in a case in order to find out the case.

(2) Procedures and requirements for evaluation.

1. Select appraiser. There are two ways to select appraisers: one is assignment, that is, the public security organ or the people's procuratorate assigns professionals with appraisal qualifications from its internal criminal technical appraisal department for appraisal; The second is hiring, that is, the public security organ or the people's procuratorate hires professionals from other departments to conduct appraisal. The appraiser entrusted or hired shall be a person who has certain professional knowledge, has no interest in this case and the parties to this case, and can ensure an objective and fair appraisal.

2. The investigation organ shall provide necessary conditions for the appraiser to conduct appraisal, send relevant samples, comparative samples and other original materials to the appraiser in time, introduce the situation related to appraisal, and clearly put forward the problems that need to be solved by the appraiser, but shall not imply or force the appraiser to make certain appraisal conclusions.

3. The appraiser shall abide by professional ethics and adhere to the principle of seeking truth from facts when conducting appraisal. If an appraiser intentionally makes a false appraisal, he shall bear legal responsibility.

4. After the appraisal, the appraiser shall write the appraisal conclusion and sign it. The appraisal conclusion shall give a clear answer to the questions raised by the investigators and explain its scientific or technical basis. In practice, the appraisal conclusion is generally made in the form of an appraisal book.

According to the second paragraph of Article 120 of the Criminal Procedure Law, if the controversial medical appraisal of personal injury needs to be re-appraised, or the psychiatric medical appraisal should be conducted by the hospital designated by the provincial people's government. After the appraisal, the appraiser shall write the appraisal conclusion, which shall be signed by the appraiser and stamped with the official seal of the hospital.

5. Investigators shall review the expert conclusion of the appraiser, and if in doubt, they may ask the appraiser to make supplementary appraisal. When necessary, an appraiser may be appointed or hired for re-appraisal.

According to Article 12 1 of the Criminal Procedure Law, the investigation organ shall inform the criminal suspect and the victim of the expert conclusion used as evidence. If a criminal suspect or victim applies, he may conduct supplementary appraisal or re-appraisal to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the criminal suspect or victim. (A) the concept and significance of identity

Identification refers to a kind of investigation behavior in which investigators let victims, witnesses and criminal suspects identify articles, documents, places or criminal suspects related to crimes when necessary in order to find out the case.

As a kind of investigation, identification is not explicitly stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Law, but it is specifically stipulated in the regulations of the Ministry of Public Security and the rules of the Supreme People's Procuratorate. Identification is a method often used in investigation procedure, which is of great significance for finding out the true situation of the case, verifying the evidence and arresting the criminal suspect.

(2) Identification procedure

According to the provisions of the Ministry of Public Security and the relevant provisions of the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the appraisal shall follow the following procedures:

1. If public security organs and people's procuratorates need to identify criminal suspects in the process of investigating cases within their respective jurisdictions, they shall be approved by the head of the case-handling department or the procurator-general, respectively.

2. Identification shall be conducted under the auspices of investigators. There shall be no less than two investigators responsible for identifying cases investigated by public security organs. Before the appraisal, the appraiser should be asked in detail about the specific characteristics of the appraised object, especially to avoid the appraiser seeing the appraised object, and should be informed of the legal responsibilities that the appraiser should bear if he intends to make false appraisal.

3. When multiple appraisers appraise the same object, each appraiser shall appraise it separately. When necessary, witnesses may be present.

4. When identifying, the object of identification should be mixed with other people or objects, and no hint should be given to the appraiser. When public security organs identify criminal suspects in investigation cases, the number of people identified shall not be less than 7; When identifying photos, the number of identified photos shall not be less than 10. In the case of self-investigation by the people's procuratorate, when identifying the criminal suspect, the number of people identified shall not be less than 5; When identifying photos, not less than 5 photos should be identified; When identifying articles, there shall be no less than 5 similar articles.

5. If the appraiser doesn't want to conduct the case investigated by the public security organ in public, it may not be conducted in public, and the investigators shall keep it confidential.

6. The appraisal shall make a record, which shall be signed or sealed by the investigators, witnesses and witnesses who presided over and participated in the appraisal. (1) The concept and significance of the wanted order.

Wanted is a kind of investigation behavior in which the public security organ orders the arrest of a criminal suspect who should be arrested but is at large.

Wanted is of great significance for the public security organs to fully cooperate, mobilize and rely on the broad masses of the people to arrest criminal suspects, combat and stop crimes, and ensure the smooth progress of investigation and trial.

(2) Procedures and requirements for wanted persons.

1. Only the public security organ has the right to issue a wanted order. No other organ, unit or individual has the right to issue a wanted order on its own. When the people's procuratorate needs to hunt down a fugitive criminal suspect, the public security organ shall issue a wanted order.

When a public security organ issues a wanted order, the scope of publication is limited. According to the second paragraph of Article 123 of the Criminal Procedure Law, public security organs at all levels can directly issue wanted orders within their jurisdiction, and if they exceed their jurisdiction, they should report to the higher authorities that have the right to decide to issue them. In practice, public security organs at or above the county level can directly issue wanted orders within their jurisdiction; Adjacent public security organs at the provincial, prefectural and county levels that have a fixed cooperative relationship can copy each other's wanted orders and report them to the public security organs at higher levels for the record; If an important fugitive needs to be wanted nationwide or across cooperative areas, the public security departments and bureaus of provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government shall report to the Ministry of Public Security, which shall issue a wanted order.

2. The wanted object can only be the criminal suspect who should be arrested and escaped according to law, and of course it also includes the criminal suspect who was arrested and escaped while in custody.

3. The wanted order shall specify the wanted person's name, gender, age, native place, clothes and physical features, and be accompanied by photos. Except for matters that must be kept confidential, the time, place and nature of the case shall be stated. The wanted order must be stamped with the seal of the issuing authority.

4. After the release of the wanted order, if new important information is found, the notice can be re-issued. The notice shall indicate the number and date of the original wanted order.

5. After receiving the wanted notice, public security organs at all levels must arrange organizational forces in time and take effective measures to do a good job in investigation and arrest.

6. If the wanted person has been brought to justice, died or the wanted reason has disappeared, and he no longer needs to be wanted, the public security organ that issued the wanted order shall immediately notify the cancellation of the wanted order within the original release scope.