How to write the complaint for compensation for wrongful detention?

In our daily life, cases of state compensation may not be particularly common, but in fact, there are some invisible things that need state compensation in criminal or administrative aspects. For example, if a wrong case is wrongly charged, you must apply for state compensation. Many people want to know this clearly. How to write the complaint for compensation for wrongful detention? 1. How to write the complaint for compensation for wrongful detention? Complainant of state compensation for wrongful detention: male, Han nationality, 60 years old, now living. Complaint: Request the Supreme People's Court to revoke the No.5 decision of the Compensation Committee of the Higher People's Court and re-enter the state compensation procedure. Facts and reasons My unjust, false and wrong case was created by the Commission for Discipline Inspection in the middle of 1983 and established by the final judgment of the Municipal Intermediate People's Court in 1986. After a long complaint: in mid-July 2006, the national law was finally recognized by the national courts, and the Municipal Intermediate People's Court revoked the wrong judgments of the two courts with criminal judgments and declared me innocent. According to the relevant laws and regulations of the state, once the unjust, false and wrong case is confirmed by the state judicial department, the victim not only has the right to apply for state compensation to the organ liable for compensation, but also the compensation organ shall make compensation according to three situations. However, the two courts in Inner Mongolia and Hohhot rejected my application for compensation on the grounds of "non-retroactivity". In fact, the so-called "non-retroactivity" has been criticized by the national the Supreme People's Court in 1995, which is known to me as a common people. Don't the full-time legal staff in charge of state compensation in Inner Mongolia High Court know? The laws of the country require the higher courts to supervise the work of the lower courts! The Compensation Committee of Inner Mongolia High Court not only sheltered its subordinates, but also threw dirty water at me out of thin air to cover up the truth! If you don't believe me, second, the specific facts. The current state compensation law has no provisions on compensation for mental damage. Everyone knows this, and I know it better! So I didn't ask for compensation for mental damage in my application for compensation. However, the judgment of the Higher People's Court of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region said that I had filed a request for compensation for mental damage. In this regard, I asked the Inner Mongolia High Court to give me a statement with evidence. China's criminal procedure law clearly stipulates that there is no additional punishment for appeal. However, I was sentenced to two years in prison for appealing, which is a historical fact! As evidenced by the judgment of the people's court of Xincheng District. However, the judgments of the people's courts in Inner Mongolia and Hohhot all stated that my first sentence was 10 years and 12 years. In this regard, I asked the courts in Inner Mongolia and Hohhot to give me a statement with evidence. The compensation decision of the Higher People's Court stated: "Jiang Yongsheng, the claimant of compensation, was acquitted by the Intermediate People's Court of Hohhot, and the fact that he was wrongly detained has been confirmed, so he has the right to apply for state compensation according to law. However, the infringement occurred after 1995 1 and before the implementation of the State Compensation Law, and did not last until 1995 1. In fact, the damage caused by the wrong judgment of Hohhot Intermediate People's Court 20 years ago continued until July 2006 13. In this regard, I have documentary evidence issued by national law enforcement departments to support my statement! Prove the existence of facts! ! For: "It didn't last until after 1995 65438+ 10/. "Inner Mongolia High Court has evidence to prove their conclusion? If there is! Please show it to the public. To sum up, it can be completely proved that the legal compensation word No.5 in the decision of the Compensation Committee of the Higher People's Court of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2007) is not a legal document at all. It's a red-headed document with problems. Officials protect each other, public power is for private use, and people are in dire straits! In this regard, not only should it be revoked! It is even more necessary to investigate the responsibility of the parties. If the Supreme People's Court thinks my appeal is unreasonable; Then I ask your institute to organize a hearing and invite relevant legal experts, public figures and news media to participate. My lawyer and I will argue with the judges in charge of state compensation in the courts of Inner Mongolia and Hohhot to see who is right and who is wrong! In this country's compensation indictment, it is necessary to write clearly some specific reasons and factual basis applicable to the parties, and some basic information of the parties also needs to be briefly introduced.