2065438+July 2008, Chen Jizhi was criminally detained by the Beijing Public Security Bureau on suspicion of illegal fund-raising, fraud and illegal absorption of public deposits. After a year-long investigation, Chen Jizhi was prosecuted by the Beijing Municipal Procuratorate on charges of illegal fund-raising, fraud, illegal absorption of public deposits, job occupation, etc.
The Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court held through trial that during his tenure as the chairman of Beijing Kunlun Wan Wei Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Kunlun Wan Wei"), Chen Jizhi used the company's funds and resources to engage in illegal fund-raising, fraud, illegal absorption of public deposits and other activities, and the amount involved was as high as1065438+77 million yuan. At the same time, Chen Jizhi is also suspected of corruption and misappropriation of public funds. In the end, Chen Jizhi was sentenced to 24 years in prison and fined 1. 1 100 million yuan.
Trial process
Chen Jizhi's trial process lasted for nearly a year. During this period, the court held several sessions and listened to the litigation opinions and evidence of both the prosecution and the defense and the victim. Chen Jizhi himself also appeared in court many times and defended.
During the trial, Chen Jizhi's defense lawyers mainly used insufficient evidence and excessive sentencing as their main defense reasons. However, the court held that Chen Jizhi's crime was serious and the amount involved was huge, which caused great damage to the public interest and should be severely punished according to law.
Social repercussions
Once the news that Chen Jizhi was sentenced to 24 years in prison was announced, it immediately aroused widespread concern in society. Some people think that Chen Jizhi's crime is serious and should be severely punished. However, some people questioned whether the court decision was too heavy, and thought that Chen Jizhi's personal situation and social contribution should be taken into account.
In addition, Chen Jizhi's case has also attracted people's attention to economic crimes such as illegal fund-raising and fraud. Some experts believe that the crackdown on such crimes should be strengthened to protect the public's property safety.