First of all, in order to facilitate the explanation and make the media friends such as Harbin TV better understand this article, please allow me to quote a news video broadcast by Harbin TV. This video was widely spread by media netizens and was "beaten" by the director of the police station when she closed the door.
This video shows that on April 14, Cao Yang, a female reporter from Harbin, was broadcast live by the information channel of Harbin TV Station and went to the police station to cover a logistics dispute.
The content of the dispute is that the logistics and merchants agreed to deliver goods 1 10,000 or so, and the logistics will charge 60,000 yuan afterwards. Both sides refused to accept it. The TV station reported that "lawyers" introduced the suspected fraud and "guided" them to the police.
When the female reporter accompanied the client to the police station for an interview, she was stopped and her mobile phone was taken away without permission.
Subsequently, Harbin TV broadcasted the above report, saying that the police brutally enforced the law and the police chief beat the female reporter, which caused widespread public concern and condemned the police.
Fans watched the video carefully, only to find that many behaviors of female journalists and TV stations were suspected of violating the rules. Of course, compared with the more popular police beating female journalists, almost no one cares about the violations of TV stations.
In order to show fairness, Brother Fan dared to ask questions to Harbin TV Station and related media in his personal capacity today:
First, the TV program did not disclose whether the logistics and the merchants signed a contract and the specific content of the contract. According to the video content, it should be that after the price was agreed in advance, one party temporarily raised the price. This situation is a civil dispute.
So, first of all, the first mistake of video reporting is that it is clear that the police have no jurisdiction over the case (large civil disputes should be directly prosecuted by the parties), but the news report quotes the unilateral statement of the parties, saying that the police will not accept the letter and induce public opinion to attack the police for shirking and kicking the ball.
It is understandable that individual lawyers often make irresponsible and illegal remarks in interviews with the media in order to become famous and expand the source of cases.
However, as a provincial TV station, should we be cautious when choosing quotations? Should we be responsible for the people, the truth and the law before quoting?
Otherwise, can the media really come forward to clarify and apologize for the misunderstanding caused by the police, as they advertised? !
Secondly, according to the video, the female reporter interviewed by Harbin TV Station to the police station is Cao Yang, and the report did not disclose whether to show her press card.
In order to verify whether the interviews of Harbin and Taiwan Province reporters are in compliance, Fan Ge carefully inquired about Cao Yang's press card on China reporter's website for many times. Incredibly, despite repeated inquiries, there is still no result!
It should be emphasized that in order to ensure rigor, fans enter Harbin TV Station, Harbin TV Station, Harbin TV Station Information Channel and Harbin TV Station Information Channel.