1. The standards for lawyers to collect legal fees are as follows:
(1) Providing legal advice, acting as an agent to appeal, accuse and apply for bail pending trial in the investigation stage, 1500- 10000 yuan/piece; Review and prosecution stage 2000- 10000 yuan/piece; 3,000-30,000 yuan/piece in the preliminary examination stage;
(2) Acting for criminal, civil and administrative litigation cases and state compensation cases, as well as acting for various litigation cases, and charging 200-3000 yuan/hour.
2. Legal basis: Article 6 of the Measures for the Administration of Lawyers' Service Fees.
The benchmark price and floating range of government-guided prices shall be formulated by the competent price departments of the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government in conjunction with the judicial administrative departments at the same level.
Article 9
The fees for lawyer services with market-regulated prices shall be determined by the law firm through consultation with the clients.
The following main factors shall be considered when a law firm negotiates the fees for lawyer services with its clients:
Working hours spent;
(two) the difficulty of legal affairs;
(3) the client's affordability;
(4) Risks and responsibilities that lawyers may bear;
(5) The lawyer's social reputation and working level.
Second, what are the ways for lawyers to charge?
According to the different service contents, the lawyer's service fee can be charged by piece, by the proportion of the target amount, by time and by the risk agent. Lump-sum charge refers to taking charge of the case to the end after charging the fee, that is, charging the fee only once, and being responsible for the first trial, second trial and execution. The charging standard is appropriately raised on the basis of the first-instance charge in the conventional charging. Lump-sum charge refers to taking charge of the case to the end after charging the fee, that is, charging the fee only once, and being responsible for the first trial, second trial and execution. The charging standard is appropriately raised on the basis of the first-instance charge in the conventional charging. The above charging methods shall be determined by the lawyer and the client through consultation according to the specific circumstances.