Article 41, paragraph 1, provides for administrative litigation in which the counterpart refuses to accept the decision made by the administrative organ. Because the administrative decision is a legal document, the legal provisions are similar to the legal provisions of the retrial period of the effective people's court judgment documents, and are limited to the time limit for the relative person to carry out administrative prosecution. Therefore, the object is the relative person when the administrative organ makes a decision. article 42 provides that administrative organs infringe upon the legitimate rights of other interested parties after making a decision for the other party. The legislative purpose of this provision fully embodies the determination of the people's court to punish the corruption of administrative staff and protect the legitimate rights of citizens, legal persons or other organizations. As long as the administrative organ fails to correct it in time, the victims involved in the real estate case can bring an administrative lawsuit to the people's court at any time within 2 years and other victims within 5 years to safeguard their legitimate rights, and the people's court will try it according to law. Therefore, the object is the victim (that is, the interested party) after the administrative organ makes a decision.
the purpose is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of all parties.
Some judicial organs deliberately reverse the right and wrong stipulated in the above-mentioned laws and treat the victim as a relative. When the above legal provisions are generally applied (only Article 41 is applicable), many victims are blocked or kicked out of the prosecution door after accepting the case, and the victims are really not protected by law.