At the same time, the Wife of the Only Survivor also gives a clearer statement about the role consciousness of Rong Zhi Sr in the process of kidnapping and extortion. To a certain extent, Rong Zhi Sr. is not only responsible for luring men to the rental house, but also for meeting the families of the abductees to confirm whether they call the police. In a word, old Rong Zhi seems to be more free, at least if he wants to get rid of France and Britain, there are many opportunities.
For such a fact, it is actually in the same direction as the carpenter's attorney's questioning, that is, it is understandable to be coerced once and twice, and it is naturally unreasonable to be coerced three times and four times. Therefore, going back to the causal logic of old Rong Zhi claiming to be the victim, it is obviously with the color of "hard mouth" to bridge the gap for "exemption from punishment".
Of course, as far as the details of the "wife of the only survivor" interviewed by the media are concerned, the prosecution should be clear from beginning to end, so it is reasonable to emphasize that "Old Rong Zhi refused to plead guilty and was extremely subjective and vicious". In order to save himself, he did not sincerely repent and broke through the bottom line of human nature and law. " As for the media non-fiction interview, it just shows the specific crime process.
Therefore, to return to the victim's legitimate defense, we should look at it from two levels: first, old Rong Zhi was indeed a tool for committing crimes and sexual assault in France at the beginning; Secondly, after being coerced into committing a crime, Old Rong Zhi did not choose to escape, which should be moved by "getting something for nothing". After all, France and Britain will paint a bright future for her.
Therefore, when investigating the case of Old Rong Zhi, we need to make a comprehensive qualitative analysis at different levels. In the final analysis, if the case only involves one time, then the logical probability of the victim's self-defense called by old Rong Zhi can be established. However, if the case involves many times, there is a chance to escape, and there is a chance to call the police, then the obvious case cognition will naturally tend to be a "conspiracy" sequence.
You know, in the victim logic of old Rong Zhi, the core proposition is "Because you are a victim, it seems that evil behavior does not exist." For such self-defense logic, it seems very reasonable, but in fact, we all know that "the cause of the cause is not the cause, and the result of the result is not the result." In this respect, according to the old Rong Zhi, nature is a fight between trapped animals.
As a matter of fact, we can see from the response of the defense lawyers in Rong Zhi, the defense lawyers met with Rong Zhi 16 times. At first, she only cared about the outside world's views and didn't care about sentencing. She would rather be sentenced to death than to life imprisonment. /kloc-After meeting for 0/6 times, her mentality began to change and her desire for survival became stronger. She was very concerned about the progress of the case and took the initiative to ask for a public hearing.
To some extent, Rong Zhi Sr should know what crime she committed, which is why she fled incognito for 20 years, and immediately chose the death penalty after her arrest. But out of instinctive desire for survival, she can only prove her identity as a victim at first, but can't deny her later criminal facts.
In addition, the "survivor's wife" mentioned the "scandal" many times when talking about the reasons for not calling the police. This is also a fact that lured old Rong Zhi and a powerful response to the presumption that old Rong Zhi and France and Britain conspired to commit crimes. Therefore, at the end of the interview, the "survivor's wife" emphasized that "I believe that the jurisprudence will give a fair judgment", which is basically inclined to the verdict.
In the final analysis, jurisprudence pays attention to factual causality, not simple logical causality. Therefore, even if France and Britain play the role of controllers, it does not necessarily prove that old Rong Zhi is innocent. Because from the whole criminal link, old Rong Zhi has always been a very important role. So the "wife of the only survivor" will think, "If she hadn't found another man to rent her own house, France and Britain wouldn't have succeeded."
And the most critical issue is that old Rong Zhi is not only the fulcrum of seduction, but also the key verifier to confirm whether the kidnapped family members call the police. So she claims to be a victim, which can only prove that she was hurt by France and Britain, but she can't get rid of the fact that she and France and Britain conspired to commit crimes. I have to say that she is really breaking through the bottom line of humanity and jurisprudence.
At the same time, it is cruel to let the "survivor's wife" answer the case of that year. On the one hand, as a man whose wife is philandering with ransom, this is distorted; On the other hand, whenever there is a conflict in the negotiation process, the so-called "sole survivor" may become the victim of blood-spattered rental houses.
Therefore, even if the times have changed, the inner terror of the parties should still be real. Let us temporarily ignore the weight of the public interest of the parties, and only rely on the label of "the only survivor", the selfish trial may be full of infinite passion. At this time, if we look at the "old family" again and insist that the existence of the old family is threatened, we always feel that "whose family is distressed" is a constant reason. Besides, most of them are unkind words.
I have to admit, compared with the desire for truth and justice, everyone is more willing to start from vested interests and selectively defend themselves or deceive themselves. The existence of jurisprudence is to better balance the sense of right and wrong, and let well-meaning people go to hell viciously until the sun shines and justice crystallizes.