Three provisions on preventing judicial intervention

Legal analysis: The "three provisions" to prevent judicial intervention refer to the provisions on the records, reports and accountability of leading cadres' intervention in judicial activities and handling of specific cases, the provisions on the records and accountability of cases in which internal personnel of judicial organs ask questions, and some provisions on further standardizing the communication between judicial personnel and parties, lawyers, special stakeholders and intermediary organizations.

Legal basis: Article 408 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC). State functionaries who are responsible for the supervision and management of environmental protection are seriously irresponsible and cause serious environmental pollution accidents, resulting in heavy losses to public and private property or serious consequences of personal injury or death, and shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention. Article 408 Any functionary of a state organ responsible for the supervision and administration of food and drug safety who abuses his power or neglects his duty, if any of the following circumstances causes serious consequences or other serious circumstances, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention; Whoever causes especially serious consequences or has other especially serious circumstances shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years but not more than 10 years: (1) concealing or falsely reporting food safety accidents or drug safety incidents; (2) failing to investigate and deal with the serious food and drug safety violations found; (three) in the process of examination and approval of drugs and special foods, the application that does not meet the requirements is granted permission; (four) should be transferred to judicial organs for criminal responsibility according to law; (five) there are other acts of abuse of power or dereliction of duty. Whoever commits the crime mentioned in the preceding paragraph for favoritism and malpractice shall be given a heavier punishment.

skill

The above answer is only for the current information combined with my understanding of the law, please refer carefully!

If you still have questions about this issue, I suggest you sort out relevant information and communicate with professionals in detail.