If the confession is untrue or extorted by torture, the confession can be retracted. If the transcript is seriously inconsistent with the facts, lawyers can play a role, but they should pay attention to collecting evidence. If the first confession is unclear or wrong, you can make different confessions in the subsequent confession. However, retraction refers to deliberately making different confessions, which is not allowed by the criminal procedure law and is not conducive to the correct characterization of the crime and accurate sentencing. Taking a confession is a process and procedure of reconnaissance and investigation. According to the nature of the facts and the actual development process, the investigated person (the investigated person or the party concerned) must truthfully state the facts and reflect the true nature of the objective facts, otherwise it is suspected of making legal consequences contrary to the evidence. In the process of questioning, there are acts of inducing confessions, extorting confessions by torture or other external factors, and the information provided is untrue or has serious defects, which will hinder or affect the legal effect of "taking facts as the basis and taking law as the criterion" in handling cases, you can apply for re-recording confessions. If the recorded confession is true and cannot be retracted, it is no joke to interfere with and influence the case, and there will be legal consequences.