2. What level of wildlife protection does this animal belong to?
All of them are listed in IUCN 3. 1 Edition Red List of Endangered Species) 20 12.
3. Pictures of animals
4.XXX was sentenced for selling wild animals. (Briefly summarize a case, case number, anonymity of the suspect and sentencing)
Qu Mingzhuo and Wen Shuang illegally bought, transported and sold Zhang Zhiyu's precious and endangered wild animals and their products, and the second trial was criminal judgment.
Case number: (2020) Shaanxi 7 1, No.3 at the end of the sentence.
The court held that the defendants Qu Mingzhuo, Li Xiaobo, Che and Yao illegally purchased, transported and sold four national first-class protected wild animals, sika deer 1 head and Burmese python, without the approval of the provincial wildlife authorities. There are 3 golden roosters, 4 mandarin ducks, 2 sparrows, 2 peregrine falcons, 2 black-winged kites, 2 collar horns, 1 crested eagle, 4 red-bellied eagle, 1 Japanese sparrow, 5 red-horned eagle, 1 eagle, spotted eagle. There are 2 large-headed flat turtles in CITES Appendix I, 2 macaws in CITES Appendix II, Alexander parrot 1 bird, sparrow 1 bird, green iguana 1 bird, and Japanese eagle 1 bird. According to Article 5, Paragraph 2 (1) of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Laws in the Trial of Criminal Cases of Destroying Wildlife Resources, the defendant Qu Mingzhuo's crime is particularly serious, and his behavior has constituted the crime of illegally purchasing, transporting and selling precious and endangered wildlife products, which should be punished according to law. Defendant Zhang Zhiyu illegally purchased, transported and sold two dead Burmese pythons and one green iguana 1 each, with a value of 65,000 yuan, which constituted the crime of illegally purchasing, transporting and selling precious and endangered wildlife products and should be punished according to law. Defendant Wen Shuang illegally purchased Japanese eagle 1 bird, big purple-breasted parrot 1 bird, golden Ying Ge 1 bird, gray-breasted Ying Ge 1 bird and African alligator 1 bird, with a value of 45,250 yuan, which constituted the crime of illegally purchasing precious and endangered wildlife products. Defendant Li Xiaobo illegally bought, transported and sold four dead wild animals, with a value of 1 10,000 yuan, which constituted the crime of illegally buying, transporting and selling precious and endangered wild animal products and should be punished according to law. The defendant illegally purchased, transported and sold two dead wild animals with a value of 1 10,000 yuan, which constituted the crime of illegally purchasing, transporting and selling precious and endangered wild animal products and should be punished according to law. Defendant Yao illegally bought, transported and sold dead seals 1 wild animals and macaws 1 wild animals, with a value of 7,000 yuan, which constituted the crime of illegally buying, transporting and selling precious and endangered wild animal products and should be punished according to law. The wild animals illegally purchased, transported and sold by the above-mentioned defendants are all dead bodies, not living bodies, so their criminal names should be identified as the crime of illegally purchasing, transporting and selling precious and endangered wild animal products. The defendant Qu Mingzhuo played a major role in the joint crime and was the principal offender. Defendant Zhang Zhiyu and others illegally bought, transported and sold precious and endangered wildlife products, which was a joint crime, played a major role in the joint crime and was the principal offender. The defendants Qu Mingzhuo, Yao, Li Xiaobo and Che were able to truthfully confess their crimes after they arrived at the case, which was a confession. According to the third paragraph of Article 67 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), all of them can be given a lighter punishment. Guo Moumou mailed 1 green iguana to the defendant Qu Mingzhuo, and paid the processing fee to make specimens. This fact does not constitute a crime to the defendant Qu Mingzhuo. Defendant's defense that Huang's two bodies were not mailed to Qu Mingzhuo and his defender's defense that Huang's two bodies were not mailed by the defendant, and that the green iguana could not prove that it was any of the 53 bodies, could not be used as the basis for finalizing the case. The fact has formed a chain of evidence from the evidence, and there is evidence to prove the existence of the fact, so the above defense opinions of the defendant Zhang Zhiyu and his defenders cannot be established, and the court of first instance will not adopt them. Defendant Yao argued that the dead sea dogs and dead macaws he bought from Tianjin Green Language Animal Breeding Co., Ltd. had artificial breeding licenses. After examination, Tianjin Luyu Animal Breeding Co., Ltd. has the license for artificial breeding of fur sea lions (fur seals) and red-green macaws (macaws) in South America, and it is 50% of the value of similar wild animals and their products in accordance with Article 7 of the Evaluation Method for the Value of Wild Animals and Their Products. Defendant Yao's defender believes that Tianjin Qing language has the right to approve reproduction. As long as this procedure is legal, it can be traded, which should be considered as a defense opinion of surrender. After investigation, the trading of wild animals and their products in the market must be approved by the provincial wildlife authorities. Defendant Yao and his defenders believe that Defendant Yao surrendered himself. After investigation, the public security organ summoned the defendant Yao to the case according to law after grasping the criminal facts of the defendant Yao. The defendant Yao did not conform to the plot of surrender, and the court of first instance did not adopt the defense opinion. Defendant Wen Shuang argued that the dead parrot he bought from Pengbo Parrot Farm in XX Town, Pengzhou City, Sichuan Province had artificial breeding license, but it didn't have artificial breeding license, which didn't meet the provisions of Article 7 of the Method for Evaluating the Value of Wild Animals and Their Products. Defendant's defender objected to the inspection report of Shaanxi Institute of Zoology, arguing that the inspection report was not an expert conclusion stipulated by law and could not be used as a defense opinion on the basis of finalization. Because the inspection report is an inspection of wild animal species, the defense opinion of the defendant's defender was not adopted by the court of first instance. According to the defendant's criminal circumstances, harmful consequences and penitence, according to Article 341, Paragraph 1, Article 25, Paragraph 1, Article 45, Article 47, Article 52, Article 53, Article 64 and Article 67 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), and Articles 5 and 11 of the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Laws in the Trial of Criminal Cases of Destroying Wildlife Resources, it is judged:/kloc- The defendant Qu Mingzhuo was convicted of illegally purchasing, transporting and selling precious and endangered wildlife products, sentenced to 12 years' imprisonment and fined RMB178,600. 2. Defendant Zhang Zhiyu was convicted of illegally purchasing, transporting and selling precious and endangered wildlife products, sentenced to three years and three months' imprisonment and fined RMB 13000. 3. Defendant Wen Shuang was convicted of illegally purchasing precious and endangered wildlife products, sentenced to two years' imprisonment and fined RMB 19000. Defendant Li Xiaobo was convicted of illegally purchasing, transporting and selling precious and endangered wildlife products, sentenced to seven months' imprisonment and fined RMB 4,000. 5. Defendant Che was guilty of illegally purchasing, transporting and selling precious and endangered wildlife products, sentenced to seven months' imprisonment and fined RMB 2,000. 6. Defendant Yao committed the crime of illegally purchasing, transporting and selling precious and endangered wildlife products, and was sentenced to six months and nine days in prison and fined 5600 yuan. Seven. Tools for committing crimes: One Apple mobile phone of defendant Wen Shuang and one 0PP0 mobile phone of defendant Wen Shuang were confiscated according to law and turned over to the state treasury. Wild animal products: 2 wild ducks, 2 wild ducks 1 bird, 2 cuckoos 1 bird, 2 macaws, 3 golden pheasants, 4 mandarin ducks, 2 sparrows, 2 lead-billed ducks, 4 blackbirds, 9 cuckoos with green mouths, 2 crested dogs and grey starlings. 2 bluethroated sunbirds, blackbirds 1 bird, 3 grey-breasted bamboo chickens, 2 collar horns, 5 crows with big mouths 12, 5 crows with white necks, 6 young birds with ring necks, 3 turtledoves 1 bird, 3 purple owls, 2 magpies and 6 blue magpies with red mouths. There are 65 bees and tigers with chestnut throat, 65,438+0 peaceful birds, 65,438+09 ordinary kingfishers, 65,438+0 tin finches, 65,438+0 white-browed birds, 65,438+0 birthday belts, 3 red-tailed thrushes and 65,438+blue peacocks. There are 1 Alexandra parrots, 4 cockatoos, 15 budgerigars, 1 sparrow, 5 small ones, 1 crested eagle, 4 red-bellied eagles, 1 Japanese sparrowhawk, 2 jays and 2 spotted thrushes. 2 goldfinches, 1 Pulsatilla, 3 egrets, 5 red horns, 1 eagle, 1 spotted snipe, 2 bird bones, 2 Mongolian rabbits, 1 sika deer, 65,438 domestic cats. There are 1 red-bellied squirrel, 6 squirrels, 1 badger, 1 fur seal, 1 Himalayan Marmota, 7 white-bellied tube-nosed bats, 3 middle-nosed bats, 1 dog bats, 4 Burmese pythons, 2 large-headed flat turtles and green bats. You have 1 Ying Ge with gray breast, 1 parrot with big purple breast, 1 skunk, 1 red fox, 1 fairy thrush, 1 finch, 1 finch, 65433 white waist. Chestnut-throated bee tiger 1 only, Rhododendron viridis 1 only, African pygmy crocodile skull 1 only, red and white flying squirrel 2, golden Ying Ge 1 only were confiscated according to law and handed over to the competent forestry department by Hanbin Branch of Ankang Public Security Bureau for legal treatment. Accordingly, according to the first paragraph of Article 236 of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the ruling is as follows: the appeal is dismissed and the original judgment is upheld. This is the final verdict.