Acting for Guangdong Development Bank, Guangdong Branch of Agricultural Bank of China, Jiangmen Branch of China Construction Bank and Guangzhou Baiyun Sub-branch of Bank of China to recover credit card arrears and non-performing loans, involving more than 800 litigation and non-litigation cases, and achieved high results.
consultant
He has served as company and individual legal counsel * * * with a total of 5 1 (if the same company or individual has hired legal counsel for more than two consecutive years, it will be counted as one time). Provided a large number of high-quality and efficient legal services for the parties.
lawsuit
Handled more than 300 lawsuits (excluding bank lawsuits). There is a very high success rate in handling cases of plaintiffs, defendants or other parties. For example:
The case of housing ownership dispute between Ms. Wu and Mr. Qiu, the acting appellant, won the case. (2002) Sui Min ZiNo.. 0 1085 civil judgment.
As the defendant, Mr. Ye won the case of rural contract dispute. (2002) The promise of the French people at the beginning. 1956 civil ruling.
Guangzhou * * * Pharmacy Chain Co., Ltd., as the defendant, won the case of compensation dispute caused by falling objects. (2003) Tian Fa Min Yi No.880 Civil Mediation.
Guangzhou * * * Pharmacy Chain Co., Ltd. won the case of product liability dispute as the defendant. (2003) Tian Fa Min Yi No.45 civil ruling.
On behalf of the defendant, Mr. Xiao won the case of payment dispute. (2003) Yun Fa Min Yi Chu ZiNo.. 16 1 civil judgment.
Guangzhou * * Trading Co., Ltd., as the defendant, won the dispute over the lease contract. (2003) Yunfa Minyi No.674 Civil Judgment.
The defendant Guangzhou * * * Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. won the lease contract dispute case. (2003) Yun Fa Min San Chu Zi. 1 124 civil ruling.
As the defender of appellant Chen Xbang, he defended the second trial and retrial of drug trafficking (46 kg) case, which was a great success, and the defendant was commuted from death penalty to life imprisonment. (2003) Criminal Ruling No.572 of Gaoyue Law and Punishment Final Word. Criminal Judgment (2004)No. 1 1 Zhongfa Penalty No.1.
Nanhai Yanbu Health Products Industry Co., Ltd., as the defendant, won the case of processing contract dispute. (2003) Yun Fa Min Chu Er Zi No.986 Civil Judgment. (2004) Sui Fa Min Zhong Er Zi No. 1070 civil judgment.
Acting appellant Guangzhou * * * Pharmacy Chain Co., Ltd. won the case of construction contract dispute. (2004) Sui Fa Min Si Zhong Zi No.4420 Civil Ruling.
The defendant Guangzhou * * * Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. won the lease contract dispute case. (2004) Tian Fa Min San Chu Zi. 1730 civil ruling.
Guangzhou * * * Machinery Co., Ltd., as the defendant, won the labor dispute over economic compensation. Sui Fang Lao Zhong Case Zi [2005] No.035 Award.
Acting appellant Mr. Zhang won the case in the second instance. (2005) Sui Fa Min San Zhong ZiNo.. 6 18 civil judgment.
The case of Mr. Qiu's loan dispute on behalf of the defendant won a great victory. (2005) Dong Famin Chu Er Zino. 2 10 civil judgment.
In the case of Ms. Wu's loan dispute, she won the case for the defendant. (2005) Dong Famin Chu Er Zino. 2 1 1 civil judgment.
As the defender of the defendant Jian * Village, he successfully defended his case of suspected drug trafficking (7,900g), and the defendant was sentenced to three years and six months' imprisonment. (2005) Criminal Chu Zi No.032.
Acting defendant Mr. Zhao won the case of personal injury compensation dispute in road traffic accident. (2006) Hai Min Yi No.575 Civil Mediation.
As the defender of the defendant Jiang Xfeng, he defended the case of his alleged traffic accident and achieved great success. The defendant was sentenced to three years' imprisonment, suspended for four years (ranging from three to seven years). (2006) Haixing Zi ChuNo. 1254 criminal judgment.
As the defender of the defendant Liang Xmin, he successfully defended the case of his alleged intentional injury, and the defendant was sentenced to six months in prison. (2006) Haixing Zi ChuNo. 1373 criminal judgment.
As the defender of the defendant Lin Jinyun, he successfully defended the drug trafficking case, and the defendant was sentenced to seven years' imprisonment (ranging from seven years to 15 years). (2007) Zi Chu Final Zi No.41criminal judgment of Guangzhou Railway Punishment.
foreign-related case
Handling foreign-related cases 10. Except 1, all the other 9 cases were successful.
(Hong Kong) Mr. Pan's house-changing dispute. (2000) Li Fa Fang Chu Zi No. 1352 civil judgment.
(Singapore) 2002 * * Witness case of trademark license agreement of Singapore Private Limited Company.
(France) Mr. Huang's contract witness case in 2002.
(Macau) Witness case of Mr. Zhong's house sales contract in 2003.
Chen Xbang's drug trafficking case (Taiwan Province Province). (2003) No.572 Criminal Ruling for the word "Gao Yue Fa Punishment" and (2004) No.11criminal judgment for the word "Sui Fa Punishment".
(Germany) In 2005, Germany * * United with emery and machinery manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. Foshan * * Abrasives Co., Ltd. for trademark infringement, which was settled through mediation.
(Germany) In 2005, Germany * * United with Emery and Machinery Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. Dongguan * * Trading Co., Ltd. and Dongguan * * Grinding Products Factory, and the case of unfair competition in trademark infringement was settled through mediation.
Drug trafficking case in Jian * Village (Taiwan Province Province). (2005) Criminal Chu Zi No.032.
(Hong Kong) Lin Jinyun's drug trafficking case. (2007) Zi Chu Final Zi No.41criminal judgment of Guangzhou Railway Punishment.
(Australia) Miss Hu's divorce case. (2007) Nanminyichuzi No.2286 Civil Judgment.
Classic example
In 2004, Chen Xbang, a citizen of Taiwan Province Province, was sentenced to death in the first instance on suspicion of drug trafficking (46kg). Lawyer Yang defended him in the second trial and retrial, which was a great success. Chen Xbang was sentenced to life imprisonment instead of death.
In 2004, represented the defendant Nanhai Yanbu Health Products Industry Co., Ltd. in handling contract disputes. Acting as an agent for first instance, second instance and application execution. The lawsuit was won, and so was the counterclaim.
In 2005, Jian * Village, a citizen of Taiwan Province Province, was suspected of drug trafficking (7,900 grams). Lawyer Yang successfully defended her, and Jane was sentenced to three years and six months in prison.
In 2005, Mr. Zhang, the agent appellant, was in arrears dispute. In the first trial, Mr. Zhang entrusted other lawyers to lose the case, and in the second trial, Mr. Yang turned the defeat into victory.
In 2005, Germany * * United emery and machinery manufacturing joint-stock company v. Dongguan * * Trading Co., Ltd. and Dongguan * * grinding products factory, the trademark infringement and unfair competition case was a great success, which won high praise from the parties concerned.
In 2005, the trademark infringement case of Germany * * * joint emery and machinery manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. Foshan * * abrasive Co., Ltd. was a great success and won high praise from the parties concerned.
In 2006, Jiang Xfeng was suspected of causing traffic accidents, causing death and having an escape plot. Lawyer Yang Chenggong defended him, and Jiang Xfeng was sentenced to three years' probation for four years (ranging from three to seven years).
In 2007, Hong Kong citizen Lin Jinyun was suspected of drug trafficking. Lawyer Yang successfully defended him and was sentenced to seven years' imprisonment (ranging from seven years to 15 years).