1. Who is the defendant: the mine owner? Or a government official (what department, what level)?
1, the owner of the mine. Where there are facts of civil infringement, creditor's rights and debts or criminal offences, the former directly brings a lawsuit to the people's court, while the latter reports to the people's procuratorate. If it is a general administrative violation, you can report it to the local administrative law enforcement unit, but the effect will not be very good. Usually, these bosses will buy off local law enforcement departments and officials, and general administrative violations will be simplified into minor problems.
2. government officials. The same is civil infringement, creditor's rights and debts, and directly bring a lawsuit to the people's court. If there are criminal facts, report them to the people's procuratorate. Generally, you can report administrative violations to the discipline inspection and supervision department of your unit or the discipline inspection and supervision department at a higher level, but the effect will not be very good. You should understand the truth that officials protect each other. Usually these accused people have certain social background and social relations. After being reported, someone will always tip off the news and intercede. On the surface, the discipline inspection and supervision department will actively and seriously receive your report, but in fact it is delayed, transferred and resolved due to various intertwined relationships. General administrative violations of discipline and law will roll with the punches. Unless the defendant is extremely unpopular, he will become a target of public criticism.
Second, what kind of problems did you report: economic problems? Lifestyle issues? Political issues? Or general civil tort? Creditor's rights and debts?
1. For private mine owners, there are generally no economic problems, lifestyle problems and political problems at this stage except illegal crimes. Because their economic income is high (or profiteering) and their life corruption is a new way of life, whether they support the party and the government and their principles and policies is generally not examined from the perspective of political beliefs. In fact, the party and the government and their principles and policies protect their vital interests.
2. For government officials, economic, life and political problems (problems here, not crimes) can be largely explained as problems in lifestyle and ideological realm. However, according to the current rules and regulations, there are neither defined standards nor basis for accountability. Even if your accusation is strong enough and the evidence is sufficient, it's just criticism and education. It's just talk. It's nothing to get a notice and record.
Don't be superstitious about your superiors, and don't think that the more you report to your superiors, the better. The report materials are generally transferred to the local competent department or the local judicial organ with jurisdiction.
Third, what kind (or level) of problems are reported: civil disputes? Work mistakes? Violation of discipline? Illegal? Or a criminal offence?
1, civil engineering. Although the current judicial principle is "everyone is equal before the law", in fact, it is difficult for an ordinary citizen to file a civil lawsuit with the mine owner boss or government officials. Unless the facts of the other party's civil infringement are clear, your evidence is very sufficient, and you happen to meet a decent case-handling judge, your legitimate rights and interests can basically be guaranteed. Otherwise, you spent energy, money and lost the lawsuit. Even if you win the lawsuit, you will lose money. Either you lose badly or you lose more than you gain. It is strongly recommended not to go to court with them.
2. Work mistakes, violation of discipline and law. As I said before, even if you report successfully, if the mine owner fines the money and suspends business for rectification, it will make a comeback in a few days; If it is a government official, it means criticizing education and notifying punishment. When a gust of wind passes, they will retaliate, and the consequences will be very serious!
3. Criminal offence. Report the case directly to the local procuratorate and the public security organ. But it must be that the facts reported are clear and the evidence is sufficient.
4. It is strongly recommended that you don't go to the Commission for Discipline Inspection to supervise the face-to-face report, and don't sign the report, so as not to leave the other party with a handle to retaliate. Don't do anything stupid! Remember!
4. Does the public prosecutor have any evidence? What evidence do you have? Is the evidence sufficient?
Mastering and providing evidence is the key.
1, report the facts. No matter who you report. No matter what kind of problems you report. Remember that the contents of the report must be facts, not audible judgments and superficial phenomena. For example, prostitution, corruption, embezzlement, fraud, etc. It can't be just a phenomenon or your judgment. You must make it clear when, where, who and what happened.
2. How bad the plot is. What measures have been taken in some illegal and criminal activities, especially in some civil tort activities? How despicable and dirty these means are morally and legally! Describe clearly the plot of illegal and criminal activities. Of course, these descriptions must be supported by evidence.
3. How serious the consequences are. Some mistakes and violations of discipline and law are not very serious in nature, but the consequences are very serious. For serious consequences, clear facts should be provided. For example, eating and drinking, that is to say, what hotels do you frequent, where do you eat and drink, waste money and so on. , not enough to cause the investigation process. It is necessary to make clear the amount of profligacy, the proportion of normal expenditure, the timetable of eating and drinking and the intensity of activities, or compare the public welfare expenditures such as education and poverty alleviation to explain its serious consequences. If there is civil infringement, make clear the serious consequences of the victim.
4. The evidence must be sufficient. Any fact needs evidence, not only sufficient, but also sufficient. Your grasp of the evidence is professional, so I suggest you consult a reliable professional legal person.
Verb (short for verb) media support. When necessary, find an influential and truthful media to support you. But the materials you provide must have clear facts and sufficient evidence. Under the gaze of the media, people who engage in petty actions and revenge will have scruples and restraint, so as to better protect themselves.
Six, matters needing attention:
1, rumors, phenomena and your judgment are neither facts nor evidence, just clues;
2. Don't move if there is no evidence or insufficient evidence;
3, whether to report, judge for yourself, don't listen to others, give others as cannon fodder;
4. Unless absolutely necessary, don't report it in person or sign it to avoid retaliation;
5. Be soberly aware that the punishment of the accused is not necessarily the credit of your accusation, but the sanction of other enemies (or opponents and political opponents) of the accused to a great extent, and your accusation is just an excuse for being used by them. You reported it successfully today, so beware of retaliation in the future.
The above is for reference only. Good luck!