Please help me find the defendant's verdict on the case of illegal evidence collection by the police. Thank you.

How does the defendant argue that the police illegally obtained evidence? Only the public security organ transferred the prosecution to the procuratorate, and the procuratorate considered that the evidence was insufficient and returned the file for supplementary investigation. Or when the court examines the evidence, it thinks that the evidence to be determined in this case is illegal (such as extorting a confession by torture, cheating, etc.). ) and will not be recognized. Under normal circumstances, as long as the defendant proves that the public security organ or the procuratorial organ used the above means to obtain a confession in the process of driving the investigation power, that is, your confession is not a true expression, contrary to the facts, and so on. Evidence obtained by illegal means is invalid if it is not recognized.