Criminal lawyer's defense fee exceeds

Most people like to ask this question. As far as the entry into the court is concerned, the quality of people entering the court is not as high as that of lawyers. Although there are many lawyers who have no other way out, most of them are very talented but have no chance to be judges. In China, to be a lawyer, the threshold is just whether you want to or not. Being a judge is about seeing opportunities, and it is more related to institutional and interpersonal factors. Although there are real talents entering the imperial court, it is generally difficult for these people to enter important positions. The more talented people in the imperial court, the more they will be assigned to posts such as research room, political office and office. The reason is very simple, because these posts directly serve the imperial court or leaders, and people with poor quality can't do it well, so only talented people can do it, and only talented people can deter people from other departments in these posts in the imperial court. Therefore, high-ranking people are either out of business posts or transferred by local organizations, political and legal committees and other organs. It can be found that it is not the highest-ranking judge in the court who confronts lawyers in their professional positions. However, lawyers have a great disadvantage that the whole country lacks systematicness, which leads to business training and learning becoming a mere formality. Judges have judges' colleges. Although the teaching level of judges' college is not so good, similar professional training and study have improved the professional level of judges as a whole, and judges have also learned from each other through business exchanges and study trips. From this point of view, in the profession of judge, it is very common for the state and the court to organize learning and exchange opportunities themselves. Moreover, there is also a remarkable feature of the profession of judges, that is, what new experiences and experiences judges have. Not only do judges like promotion, but the court will also take the initiative to promote referrals, because this is a political achievement, and only the more people you know can you be satisfied. On the other hand, the training of the lawyer industry cannot be said to be a mere formality. The key is that the professional level is not high, and scholars and experts are invited, which has little to do with the skills of lawyers. Secondly, lawyers tend to form business blockades and barriers. They all think what they know is precious, and they are afraid that others will know their tricks every day. The lack of communication between lawyers is determined by this professional feature, because only the weaker and more ignorant the opponents are, the stronger their competitiveness will be. Speaking of individual lawyers and judges, let's talk about the whole professional group. Courts at all levels have research rooms, judges' colleges of courts at or above the prefecture level, People's Court Newspaper sponsored by the Supreme People's Court, online forum "Rule of Law Forum" and publishing house. Although these institutions seem to be numerous, and many local institutions are regarded as redundant in the local area, they have carried out a lot of business exchanges, learning and experience summary exchanges, which indirectly improved the professional level of judges at all levels. In particular, the the Supreme People's Court Research Office and various business courts have done a lot of work, many of which have standardized business standards and issued many judicial interpretations, all of which have improved the work quality of the people's courts. But the lawyer industry does not have such resources as courts. So far, although the Chinese Lawyers Association has set up a large number of professional committees, these committees have not issued or issued any operational guidelines for the lawyer industry. The Bar Association is busy collecting lawyers' membership fees, and has not made time to study the internal development of the lawyer industry. As for learning advanced foreign experience and internal communication, it has not been listed as the internal development of the lawyer industry because of the funding channel. If we compare the quality of the staff of lawyers' associations at all levels in China with the people's courts at all levels, it will be a world of difference. Since then, we have seen that there are differences between individual lawyers and individual judges before the start, but the differences in resources and dependence behind them are thousands of times higher than before. That depends on professional ability. At present, the internal management of the courts is not standardized, and judges often rotate in various courts, which affects the professional level in the short term, but in the long run, a judge's various qualities have been cultivated and grown more comprehensively. Therefore, many court presidents said helplessly: "Our court has now become a free training base for lawyers." He said that the outstanding talents he trained often quit to become lawyers, which made the court regret that their efforts and training were in vain. Lawyers, on the other hand, depend on their own development ability, and have no case to do and no ability to exercise. Lawyers spend a lot of time looking for cases instead of handling them, and the number and situation of cases they have experienced are not as complicated as those encountered by judges. Therefore, we often find that lawyers who resign from the court are very professional, but their income is not as high as their lawyers. The reason is that there is a gap in their ability to find cases. But from another angle, the lawyer's business is supervised by the client, and the hero is judged by success or failure. The pressure is great, and naturally a single case can be thoroughly understood. Of course, it is not excluded that some fake lawyers cheat clients and some black lawyers are irresponsible, but these lawyers are very afraid of clients reporting. On the other hand, the professional orientation of judges is internal control. As long as the dean and people's congresses at all levels are satisfied, there is no particularly great pressure to handle cases, which also leads to two kinds of polarization between judges and lawyers: one is to kiss up to cases, and everything will be fine as long as the higher and lower courts do not revoke them, and even mainly to please leaders and relevant organs; One is to handle cases reliably, not afraid of power, and handle cases according to law. Of course, most judges just wander between these two kinds of people, but the level of judges who talk about learning naturally improves rapidly. In this way, from a macro perspective, we find that the innate advantages of lawyers may gradually lose their professional advantages with the overall disadvantages of the day after tomorrow. But excellent lawyers can survive, and backward judges will always stay in the judge, so after a few years, all lawyers can stay in the legal profession. The survival of the fittest mechanism between lawyers and judges has led to another decisive battle between lawyers and judges. The result of the decisive battle is that the individual lawyer still surpasses the individual judge. However, the views of ordinary people on this issue may be more valuable. The judge's social image is poor, and the key is judicial corruption, while the lawyer's social image is not good as a whole, but he has a good view of lawyers. Ordinary people just hate some black lawyers, but they still have deep affection and trust in the profession of lawyers, because they are people who speak for themselves after all. Personally, I think excellent lawyers surpass excellent judges in personality charm and free cultural quality, which also leads to more legends of lawyers than judges. In addition, the wealth myth and development myth of the lawyer industry are more exciting than the judge profession, and the worship of lawyers is more than the respect for judges. After all, lawyers are close to society, have more flexible adaptability to the needs of society and clients, and are closer to people and society in culture. All these unprofessional personalities and cultural colors are beyond the reach of excellent judges. These also make some well-educated and well-informed judges in the Supreme People's Court feel unbalanced. Besides money, what is a barrister better than me? Of course, discussing this issue is not to compete for a high or low. The reality is that the level of judges affects the evaluation of lawyers, and the views on lawyers also reflect the expectations of the times for judges. Judges and lawyers, whichever is higher, should fight, and they should fight with great fanfare. Only in this way can ordinary people see hope. But those disparaging fights, instead of denigrating each other, will only make both sides lose face. Of course, due to the different nature of judges and lawyers, the results in many fields cannot be compared. Objectively speaking, although this is an endless battle, they are fighting for the outcome of any small battle. I hope that the legal profession will surpass its own limitations in more aspects and win more victories. Lawyer, let's grow up happily together!