After the incident, Anshun explained Zhang Lei's shooting behavior as "the villagers wanted to grab the gun and shoot in self-defense".
Xu Jianguo, the plaintiff's attorney, told the Morning Post reporter that if villagers were found to have robbed with guns, Zhang Lei's shooting was self-defense and might even be exempted from criminal responsibility.
During the trial, Zhang Lei's attorney released an appraisal issued by Guizhou Public Security Bureau, which believed that Guo Yongzhi's DNA could be detected by extracting the barrel wipes used by Zhang Lei, and the similarity was above 99%. However, the prosecution produced a very different appraisal from Guizhou Public Security. The appraisal issued by the Ministry of Public Security shows that it is impossible to prove that the wiper can detect Guo Yongzhi's DNA, which overturns the saying that "villagers grab guns".
After the incident, the public security organs took 12 witness statements, of which 10 mentioned that the deceased Guo Yongzhi and Guo Yonghua had pushed and pulled Zhang Lei. In this regard, the attorney of the original defendant launched a fierce confrontation around whether Zhang Lei's shooting was self-defense or excessive defense.
Zhang Lei's lawyer believed that Zhang Lei's actions such as drawing a gun were reasonable in view of the seriousness and urgency of the situation at that time. Zhang Lei fired two shots into the air first, but the two victims did not stop attacking. Then the third shot went down and hit Guo Yonghua's leg, but the Guo brothers still didn't stop. "There were many people in the market that day. Once the gun is taken away, the consequences are unimaginable. "
Zhang Lei's lawyer also stressed that both victims were seriously drunk at that time. In this regard, the plaintiff's lawyer believes that the two deceased were in a state of serious drunkenness at that time, and it was impossible to harm the safety of Zhang Lei and the people.
The indictment also states that Zhang Lei has surrendered himself. According to the indictment, after the incident, they reported to Cai Jiayu, deputy magistrate in charge of public security work in Guanling Autonomous County, and Wu, mayor of Pogong Town, respectively, waiting for handling. After the case, they truthfully confessed their criminal behavior and should be considered as surrender.
Xu Jianguo, the plaintiff's attorney, questioned whether Zhang Lei's phone call was a surrender, arguing that Zhang Lei had a special identity. After the incident, he told the relevant person in charge by phone, which was only a report on his work behavior and identity, but he did not really surrender.
The indictment also confirmed that Zhang Lei was not detained by Zunyi Public Security Bureau until February of 10, and was arrested two days later. In the meantime, 29 days have passed since the crime was committed in June 5438+10 to criminal detention.