Defects in the right of defense in the new criminal procedure law

Although the revision of my country's Criminal Procedure Law has further reflected the concept of human rights protection as a whole, there are still many deficiencies in the practice protection of defense lawyers. Let’s briefly talk about our experience.

Article 42 of the new "Criminal Procedure Law" stipulates: "Defenders or any other person shall not help criminal suspects or defendants conceal, destroy, forge evidence or collude in confessions, and shall not threaten or induce witnesses to give false testimony. Or engage in other acts that obstruct judicial proceedings. If the defender is suspected of committing a crime in violation of the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the case shall be handled by an investigative agency other than the one handling the case. If the defender is a lawyer, his or her office shall be notified promptly. Law firms or bar associations to which they belong. "This regulation changes the original "defense lawyer and other defenders" to "defenders or any other person", which means that prosecutors and judges in judicial activities should also bear this responsibility, but Why is only the defender explicitly identified? Some lawyers believe that my country's criminal procedure law should clearly stipulate lawyer immunity, which is in line with the needs of the healthy and long-term development of criminal procedures.