1. These farmers were sentenced to eight months of criminal detention and each was fined 5,000 yuan. Besides, farmers only applied for legal aid and signed a confession. I'm afraid I'm at a loss after sentencing.
Three farmers found a sow at the oil station, so they greeted the staff at the oil station and took the sow home. The three farmers directly said that it was not for theft, otherwise they would have sold or eaten it. At that time, I just found that the sow had no owner, so I took the sow home to raise it. Farmers also have this habit, and after picking up cats and dogs, they will bring them back to their families.
Two or three farmers were sentenced for picking sows, which obviously shows that farmers do not know how to protect their legitimate rights and interests by legal means.
In this lawsuit, these three farmers simply don't know how to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests. Farmers don't know how to pay professional lawyers to defend themselves, so they can only apply for legal aid step by step. When the lawyer invited by the other party said that the three farmers were thieves, the three farmers signed a confession. Moreover, farmers made it clear that sows were raised at home and there was no idea of stealing. After being sentenced to a fine, the farmers did not know how to complain, but were scolded by the other side and had to plead guilty and serve their sentences. ?
So, who do you think should bear the responsibility in this lawsuit? ?