What about the defense lawyer who pleaded guilty in court?

Lawyers should never think that the client should deal with the defender when he pleads guilty, but should try his best to defend and give the suspect a chance to be given a lighter punishment. The defense should be concise, and whether the facts are clear and the evidence is conclusive should be considered when conviction and sentencing, so as to defend the parties.

In the defense of such cases, lawyers should grasp the following aspects:

1. First of all, ideologically, we must never think that since all the parties have confessed, lawyers don't need to defend themselves, or since all the parties have confessed, lawyers can be lazy. If the lawyer really does this, it is worthless for the client to hire a lawyer. If the client thinks it is meaningless to hire a lawyer, there is no need to hire a lawyer. This idea and practice will not ruin his work. Therefore, in the face of such cases, lawyers must not be able to cope with the defense ideologically or wholeheartedly. But try to defend it like an ordinary case. This is the first mistake that can't occur psychologically.

2. In the defense of such cases, we should try our best to seek common ground while reserving differences, and don't be picky about prosecutors or hate judges. Because of this kind of case, the parties all confessed. Then don't dwell on issues that are not critical or have little impact on sentencing. If you violate this taboo, you will not only fail to help your customers, but also hurt them. Then the client becomes a big head. Therefore, in this case, we must do it, not only have something to say, but also have something to say simply and concisely, and don't be wordy. Don't talk if you can.

3, careful analysis and study of the case, a detailed understanding of the case, do a good job. Just because the parties plead guilty does not mean that there must be no problems in such cases. Therefore, from the perspective of professional lawyers, lawyers should carefully analyze whether the facts are clear, the evidence is conclusive, the nature is correct, and the sentencing is appropriate. Only when there is no problem in principle can we consider a case in which a party pleads guilty and defends the party.

4, the defense point of view must be unconventional, so that prosecutors, judges and parties feel that lawyers are defending with their hearts and brains, rather than coping with defense. You don't have to talk much in court, but you must fight hard. If you can't, you'd better keep your mouth shut, at least don't let people in court think you're talking nonsense.

When a lawyer defends a case of pleading guilty, don't think that the criminal has pleaded guilty and pleaded guilty, so there is no need to bother to defend the client. We should carefully analyze and study the case, try our best to find evidence in favor of the client, try our best to defend the client and strive for a lighter punishment.