Can parties participating in the court hearing video access it?

The parties involved in the court hearing video can access it, but if the video content is not their own, individual citizens cannot access it. If the individual or unit that owns the surveillance video agrees to be accessed by others, it is suspected of infringing on citizens' personal information, and the content leaked after being accessed is also suspected of infringing on citizens' personal information. Surveillance videos in public * * * areas are managed by the government or public utility departments and are not content disclosed by the government. Individuals do not have the right to arbitrarily access the monitoring facilities set up by the public security organs. They should all access the local command center 110. Individuals cannot ask for it and should apply to the relevant departments.

Trial transcripts can be retrieved, but it does not rule out that some courts will not cooperate and more communication between lawyers and judges is required.

This question raises two main questions. First, did the lawyer fully analyze and predict the case when accepting it? Has the lawyer informed the client of the risks of litigation? Second, did the lawyer notify the client to appear before the trial? Did the lawyer fulfill his obligation to inform?

As for the first question, our lawyers must inform our clients of the risks of litigation before accepting a case. At present, the Guangdong Lawyers Association requires parties to issue a written "Notification of Litigation Risks" when accepting a case. Lawyers must not only pay attention to the facts of the case, but more importantly, analyze the evidence and conduct legal searches. In general, the probability of winning a lawsuit is predictable.

Of course, pre-judgment does not mean that a lawsuit is guaranteed. Do not interpret it as 100. I hope everyone understands this as higher requirements for lawyers’ responsibilities and professional qualities.

As for the second question, under normal circumstances, if a lawyer is entrusted to appear in court, the client does not need to appear in court.

Legal basis:

Article 15 of the "Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Litigation" stipulates that if the parties use audio-visual materials as evidence, they should provide the original copy of the audio-visual materials. carrier. If the party uses electronic data as evidence, the original copy shall be provided. A copy made by the electronic data producer that is consistent with the original, or a printed copy directly derived from the electronic data or other output media that can be displayed and recognized, is deemed to be the original of the electronic data.