How long after Rong Zhi Sr was sentenced to death?

The ruling of Jiangxi High Court must be reported to the Supreme People's Court for review. If the Supreme Law approves the death penalty, it will generally be executed by the court of first instance within 7 days after receiving the order to execute the death penalty. Full text 14 17 words, reading time is about 3 minutes. Li Lijun was proofread by Fan Yijing, a trainee reporter of Beijing News. This morning (165438+1October 30th), the Jiangxi Higher People's Court publicly pronounced the case of Lao's intentional homicide, robbery and kidnapping in the second instance, and ruled that the old appeal was rejected and the death sentence was upheld. Ai, doctor of law, member and partner of the Criminal Professional Committee of Beijing Shi Jing Law Firm, told reporters that the ruling of Jiangxi High Court must be reported to the Supreme People's Court for review. If the Supreme Law approves the death penalty, it will generally be executed by the court of first instance within 7 days after receiving the order to execute the death penalty. "The death penalty approval procedure is automatically initiated and does not need to be proposed by the defendant." Ai Li Xing said that after the Jiangxi Higher People's Court reported to the Supreme People's Court, a collegial panel of three judges will conduct a comprehensive review of the facts, laws and procedures of the case by means of marking papers and arraigning the defendant, and finally make a review result. During the review of the death penalty, if the defendant's defense lawyer requests to reflect his opinions in person, the collegial panel shall listen to his opinions in the office and make a record; If a defense lawyer puts forward a written opinion, it shall attach a volume. In addition, the People's Republic of China (PRC) Legal Aid Law, which came into effect on June 5438+ 10/this year, stipulates that if the defendant in the death penalty review case applying for legal aid fails to appoint a defender, the people's court shall notify the legal aid center to appoint a lawyer as a defender. Li Xing told reporters that the Supreme People's Court and the Ministry of Justice issued the Provisions on Providing Legal Aid to Defendants in Death Penalty Review Cases (Trial). It is clear that the Legal Aid Center of the Ministry of Justice shall, within three days after receiving the notice of legal aid from the Supreme People's Court, designate a lawyer with more than three years' practical experience in criminal defense as the defendant's defense lawyer, and inform the Supreme People's Court by letter. When reviewing a death penalty case, the Supreme Law will rule for approval if it finds that the facts ascertained in the original judgment and the applicable law are correct, the sentence is appropriate and the procedure is legal. If it is found that the specific facts identified in the original judgment or the legal provisions cited are wrong, but there is nothing wrong with sentencing the defendant to death, the sentence may be revised. However, the facts of the original judgment are unclear and the evidence is insufficient; The emergence of new facts and evidence that affect conviction and sentencing; In case the original trial violates legal procedures and may affect the fair trial, the Supreme Law will rule that it will not be approved, revoke the original judgment and send it back for retrial. Ai Li Xing believes that the case of Old Rong Zhi has been widely concerned by all walks of life, and the first and second trials are very cautious. In line with the above-mentioned "the facts and applicable laws in the original judgment are correct, the sentencing is appropriate, and the procedure is legal", the maximum probability will be approved. Ai Li Xing said that the death penalty review is a unique criminal trial system in China's criminal procedure law, and it is a concrete embodiment of "respecting and protecting human rights" stipulated by the Constitution, which is conducive to ensuring the correct application of the death penalty and realizing the criminal policy of killing less and killing cautiously. "It is also a key procedure to unify the death penalty norms and law enforcement standards, which is conducive to ensuring the unification of death penalty law enforcement standards from the procedure and preventing differences between regions." The reporter learned that according to the Decision on Amending the Organic Law of the People's Courts of People's Republic of China (PRC), since June 5438+ 10/day, 2007, the death penalty cases originally approved by the higher people's courts have been uniformly approved by the Supreme People's Court. At the symposium on criminal trial held in the Supreme People's Court on June165438+1October 18, Zhou Qiang, President of the Supreme People's Court pointed out that this year marks the fifth anniversary of the reform of the death penalty approval system. Review of death penalty is extremely important. We should do a good job in the trial of death penalty cases in accordance with the law, fairly and prudently, accurately grasp the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity, and ensure that the death penalty is only applicable to a very small number of criminals with extremely serious crimes and sufficient evidence. Zhou Qiang said that the reform of the death penalty approval system is a milestone in the history of the rule of law in new China, which is of great significance and far-reaching influence on the correct implementation of the law, the accurate implementation of the death penalty policy, the respect and protection of human rights, the prevention of unjust, false and wrongful cases, and the promotion of the civilization construction of the rule of law.